Skip to content
dibs

ENGR 181W

Critical Thinking and Writing for Chemical Engineers

5 units Writing II

Sections & times

Needs a grade of C or better: C- does not count, and neither does a Passed grade.

Lecture and discussion. The registrar has published a final exam time.

Fall 2026: 1 lecture and 6 discussions. Nothing here is open. The oldest of these readings was 6 hours ago.

Grades

No grade history for this course: the data runs Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Sections for Fall 2026 are below.

Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.

Reviews for ENGR 181W

Workload and assignments

Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.

There are no BruinWalk reviews of this course on record as of 17 days ago, so nobody has told dibs what kind of work it sets. That is dibs holding no reviews at all, and not reviewers who wrote without mentioning the work.

Read the source reviews

What comes first

The chain dibs can see is 2 courses long before ENGR 181W. This is a floor, not a deadline: dibs has not read a class page for ENGCOMP 2 and ENGCOMP 2I, so the real chain can only be longer than this, never shorter.

Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.

From the registrar's catalog

Lecture, four hours; discussion, two hours; outside study, nine hours. Requisite: English Composition 3. Focus on critical thinking and writing for chemical engineers. Offers broader societal context through the examination of ethical issues related to chemical engineering. Students develop skills to more effectively communicate their thoughts and their work. An engineering ethics component focuses on case study while a technical component focuses on concepts from four chemical engineering core courses. Students gain tools to think more critically and holistically about the ethical and societal dimensions of their work as chemical engineers. In-class writing and exercises are designed to help students with homework, team project, debate, and final laboratory report. Satisfies Writing II requirement. Letter grading.

Sections in Fall 2026

You enroll in the discussion, not the lecture, so a discussion's status is the one that decides whether you get in. A lecture can read open while every discussion under it is full.

Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 7 readings. Seat readings are snapshots, not live availability. Their timestamps show when dibs last checked.

From the people who took it

Student reviews

What taking ENGR 181W was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.

Your experience could be the first.

No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.

Looking for more perspectives?

External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.

Read reviews on BruinWalk

Community guidelines

Seats over time in Fall 2026

How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it.

A dot is a reading where something moved: the seat count, the status, or the waitlist.

What a flat run means, and where a line starts

Flat between dots means it did not drift, it held and then jumped, and a line starts when dibs first saw that lecture rather than reaching back before it existed. A lecture that has never moved draws a flat line across the whole window, and one with two or three readings draws a line joining them, which is too few to read a trend from.

Lec 1 · Chang, J.P. · 74 enrolled

Nothing read since 1 Oct, 3 hours ago. Over about 1 month before that, same seat count, but the status went closed to closed by the department, the cap went 74 to 84, the cap stopped being published, and the seat count moved and came back.

74 of 84 · no seats left in its discussions
18 Aug 21:409 Sep 20:411 Oct 19:43 · 3 hours ago
dibs read 168 of the 758 hours its hourly record covers, 22%, and did not look in 590. dibs had no hourly record before 31 Aug, which is the other 297 of 1055 plotted.74 of 84 enrolled at the newest reading, 3 hours ago, and no seats left in its discussions. Seats from 18 Aug 21:40 to 1 Oct 19:43, 74 to 74. dibs read 168 of the 758 hours its hourly record here covers, 22%. An hour marked as read confirms a check, not continuous monitoring. That check recorded no change; changes between checks may be missed. For 590 hours dibs was keeping a record and did not reach this section. Nothing before 31 August at 06:00, where this section's record starts, has a read either way, which is 297 hours of this window. Where the drawing is faint or broken, that never means the readings are doubtful. It means the stretch between them is unaccounted for.
How readings and alerts work

A reading and an hourly record are different things, and most charts here hold more of the second missing than present. dibs has taken readings of a section since long before it began keeping an hour-by-hour log of when it looked, so the empty stretches are dibs saying it was not keeping that log yet, not that it looked and found nothing. That is the age of the record and not a fault.

Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.

The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.