Skip to content
dibs

NURSING 408

Interprofessional Collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health

3 units

Sections & times

Lecture.

Fall 2026: 1 section. It is open. The oldest of these readings was 86 minutes ago.

Grades

3.98

Average grade awarded in NURSING 408. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.

In the A range

100%

of the 25 letter grades

D, F or W

0.0%

of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals

Taken pass/no pass

-

the registrar has this letter grade only this term

The registrar's own records: 25 grades over 2 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.

What is inside that record

Every one of those terms is a summer session, and summer sessions are counted here.

The table below splits them, and term averages across those 2 terms ran 3.94 to 4.00.

Historical grades for ECONOMOU, DENICE, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.

No grade history is available for this professor in this course.

By instructor

Predicted GPA, raw average, sample size, terms, A range and the workload reviewers reported for every instructor with a grade record in this course
Instructor Predicted GPA Raw n Terms A range Workload Fall 2026
BROWN, THERESA A reviews ↗ 3.96 4.00 15 · 1 100% - not teaching it
KEENAN, COLLEEN K reviews ↗ 3.93 3.94 10 · 1 100% - not teaching it
Why Predicted is not the Raw average

“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.

Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.

Reviews for NURSING 408

Workload and assignments

Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.

dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.

Read the source reviews

From the registrar's catalog

Lecture/seminar, three hours. Requisite: doctoral standing. Designed to acquaint DNP students with contemporary issues in health care professions and expose students to interprofessional collaborative practice concepts and competencies. Debate of barriers and facilitators to achieving model collaborative practice. Exploration of innovative opportunities to change current practice. Exploration of students’ personal belief systems about high-level collaboration and team performance. Addresses relationship between interprofessional education, practice, and health care outcomes and processes to prepare DNP graduate to assume leadership roles. Letter grading.

Sections in Fall 2026

Seat counts as of . Seat readings are snapshots, not live availability. Their timestamps show when dibs last checked.

From the people who took it

Student reviews

What taking NURSING 408 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.

Your experience could be the first.

No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.

Looking for more perspectives?

External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.

Read reviews on BruinWalk

Community guidelines

Seats over time in Fall 2026

How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it.

A dot is a reading where something moved: the seat count, the status, or the waitlist.

What a flat run means, and where a line starts

Flat between dots means it did not drift, it held and then jumped, and a line starts when dibs first saw that lecture rather than reaching back before it existed. A lecture that has never moved draws a flat line across the whole window, and one with two or three readings draws a line joining them, which is too few to read a trend from.

Lec 1 · Economou, D. · 24 of 28 enrolled

Filled by 2 over about 1 month

24 of 28 · 4 left
18 Aug 19:409 Sep 19:561 Oct 20:12
dibs read 168 of the 540 hours its hourly record covers, 31%, and did not look in 372. dibs had no hourly record before 9 Sep, which is the other 518 of 1058 plotted.24 of 28 enrolled at the newest reading, 86 minutes ago, with 4 left. Seats from 18 Aug 19:40 to 1 Oct 20:12, 22 to 24. dibs read 168 of the 540 hours its hourly record here covers, 31%. An hour marked as read confirms a check, not continuous monitoring. That check recorded no change; changes between checks may be missed. For 372 hours dibs was keeping a record and did not reach this section. Nothing before 9 September at 09:00, where this section's record starts, has a read either way, which is 518 hours of this window. Where the drawing is faint or broken, that never means the readings are doubtful. It means the stretch between them is unaccounted for.
How readings and alerts work

A reading and an hourly record are different things, and most charts here hold more of the second missing than present. dibs has taken readings of a section since long before it began keeping an hour-by-hour log of when it looked, so the empty stretches are dibs saying it was not keeping that log yet, not that it looked and found nothing. That is the age of the record and not a fault.

Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.

The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.