ENGCOMP 2
Approaches to University Writing
Lecture.
Fall 2026: 17 sections. Nothing here is open. The oldest of these readings was 24 minutes ago.
Grades
3.43
Average grade awarded in ENGCOMP 2. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
61%
of the 2,168 letter grades
D, F or W
3.3%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 2,168 grades over 17 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
4 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 17 terms ran 2.77 to 3.73.
Historical grades for CROSBY, SHANE, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 91 · 15.8%
- A 287 · 49.9%
- A- 3 · 0.5%
- B 100 · 17.4%
- B- 1 · 0.2%
- C 65 · 11.3%
- D 11 · 1.9%
- F 17 · 3.0%
Percentages are of the 575 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes.
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Fall 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CROSBY, SHANE reviews ↗ | 3.42 | 3.42 | 575 | 14 | 66% | light | Closed |
| PATCHIGONDLA, JADA reviews ↗ | 3.30 | 3.29 | 386 | 13 | 49% | average | not teaching it |
| WANG, TIANFANG SALLY reviews ↗ | 3.75 | 3.78 | 192 | 5 | 89% | - | not teaching it |
| KETAI, RACHEL LEWIS reviews ↗ | 3.49 | 3.49 | 161 | 4 | 64% | very light | not teaching it |
| POPHAM, SHELBY A reviews ↗ | 2.93 | 2.86 | 120 | 3 | 24% | heavy | not teaching it |
| WESTRUP, LAUREL A reviews ↗ | 3.55 | 3.57 | 98 | 3 | 66% | very light | Closed |
| SHERWOOD, LESLIE ANNE reviews ↗ | 3.33 | 3.32 | 95 | 4 | 49% | - | not teaching it |
| MARTINEZ, ANDREW M reviews ↗ | 3.76 | 3.82 | 90 | 3 | 91% | light | Closed |
| DICKEY, DOMINIQUA reviews ↗ | 3.13 | 3.07 | 82 | 2 | 18% | average | not teaching it |
| SPOONER, MARY reviews ↗ | 3.70 | 3.75 | 81 | 2 | 78% | very light | Closed |
| CHRISTENSEN, TAMAR S reviews ↗ | 3.44 | 3.45 | 75 | 3 | 61% | heavy | not teaching it |
| LISOVSKY, KARL F reviews ↗ | 3.35 | 3.33 | 63 | 2 | 43% | average | not teaching it |
| WARTANIAN, RAFFI J reviews ↗ | 3.54 | 3.57 | 59 | 2 | 63% | - | not teaching it |
| SAMUELSON, MARY G reviews ↗ | 3.48 | 3.50 | 51 | 3 | 61% | average | not teaching it |
| HOLTEN, CHRISTINE reviews ↗ | 3.46 | 3.47 | 40 | 1 | 55% | average | not teaching it |
| DAVIS, JACQUELINE MARIE reviews ↗ | 3.63 | 3.72 | 40 | 1 | 80% | - | Closed |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for ENGCOMP 2 in any term it holds, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
In Falls
Ran in 5 of the last 5 Falls.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, four hours. Requisite: proficiency demonstrated on Analytical Writing Placement Examination (enforced) or course A (C or better). Second course in university-level discourse, with analysis and critique of university-level texts. Emphasis on revision for argumentative coherence and effective style. Completion of course with grade of C or better satisfies Entry-Level Writing requirement. Letter grading.
Sections in Fall 2026
Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 17 readings. Seat readings are snapshots, not live availability. Their timestamps show when dibs last checked.
-
Lec 1 TR 10:00am-11:50amClosed3.55predicted, this instructor · 98 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 2 TR 2:00pm-3:50pmClosed3.55predicted, this instructor · 98 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 3 TR 8:00am-9:50amCancelled
No instructors
3.43predicted, all instructors · 2,168 gradesno enrollment count published -
-
Lec 4 MW 2:00pm-3:50pmClosed3.42predicted, this instructor · 575 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 5 MW 4:00pm-5:50pmClosed3.42predicted, this instructor · 575 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 6 MW 10:00am-11:50amClosed3.43predicted, all instructors · 2,168 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 9 MW 8:00am-9:50amClosed3.76predicted, this instructor · 90 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 10 MW 10:00am-11:50amClosed3.76predicted, this instructor · 90 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 11 MW 12:00pm-1:50pmClosed3.76predicted, this instructor · 90 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 12 TR 12:00pm-1:50pmClosed3.70predicted, this instructor · 81 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 13 TR 2:00pm-3:50pmClosed3.70predicted, this instructor · 81 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 15 TR 10:00am-11:50amClosed3.43predicted, all instructors · 2,168 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 16 TR 2:00pm-3:50pmClosed3.43predicted, all instructors · 2,168 grades
15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 17 Time TBACancelled
No instructors
3.43predicted, all instructors · 2,168 gradesno enrollment count published -
-
Lec 22 TR 12:00pm-1:50pmClosed3.63predicted, this instructor · 40 grades
11 of 11 · 4 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 23 TR 2:00pm-3:50pmClosed3.63predicted, this instructor · 40 grades
10 of 10 · 3 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 24 Time TBAClosed by the department
No instructors
3.43predicted, all instructors · 2,168 gradesno enrollment count published no history
Final enrollment, averaged across each term's sections: between 16 and 20 a term over 13 terms, summer excluded, most recently 20 in Fall 2025. That is the shape across years, not this term, which is above.
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking ENGCOMP 2 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.
Seats over time in Fall 2026
How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it. This course runs 17 lectures; the legend under the chart picks one.
A dot is a reading where something moved: the seat count, the status, or the waitlist.
What a flat run means, and where a line starts
Flat between dots means it did not drift, it held and then jumped, and a line starts when dibs first saw that lecture rather than reaching back before it existed. A lecture that has never moved draws a flat line across the whole window, and one with two or three readings draws a line joining them, which is too few to read a trend from.
Lec 1 · Westrup, L.A. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 2 over about 2 months
Lec 2 · Westrup, L.A. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 4 over about 2 months
Lec 3 · No instructors · -
Freed 3 seats over about 1 month
Lec 4 · Crosby, S. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 3 over about 2 months
Lec 5 · Crosby, S. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 4 over about 2 months
Lec 6 · Rubinson, G.J. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 4 over about 2 months
Lec 9 · Martinez, A.M. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 11 over about 2 months
Lec 10 · Martinez, A.M. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 5 over about 2 months
Lec 11 · Martinez, A.M. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 3 over about 2 months
Lec 12 · Spooner, M. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 6 over about 2 months
Lec 13 · Spooner, M. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 9 over about 2 months
Lec 15 · Hitchner, T.A. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 10 over about 2 months
Lec 16 · Hitchner, T.A. · 15 of 15 · 5 over enrolled
Filled by 9 over about 2 months
Lec 17 · No instructors · -
Freed 1 seat over about 1 month
Lec 22 · Davis, J.M. · 11 of 11 · 4 over enrolled
Filled by 6 over about 2 months
Lec 23 · Davis, J.M. · 10 of 10 · 3 over enrolled
Filled by 7 over about 2 months
Lec 24 · No instructors · -
Unchanged over about 2 months
Both readings say 0 seats.
How readings and alerts work
A reading and an hourly record are different things, and most charts here hold more of the second missing than present. dibs has taken readings of a section since long before it began keeping an hour-by-hour log of when it looked, so the empty stretches are dibs saying it was not keeping that log yet, not that it looked and found nothing. That is the age of the record and not a fault.
Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.
The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.