ENGCOMP 3
English Composition, Rhetoric, and Language
Lecture. The registrar has published a final exam time.
Fall 2026: 28 sections. Nothing here is open. The oldest of these readings was 32 minutes ago.
Grades
3.63
Average grade awarded in ENGCOMP 3. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
73%
of the 7,329 letter grades
D, F or W
1.4%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 7,329 grades over 17 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
4 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 17 terms ran 3.43 to 3.92.
Historical grades for BULLWINKLE, DAVID, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 13 · 31.7%
- A 16 · 39.0%
- A- 6 · 14.6%
- B+ 3 · 7.3%
- B 2 · 4.9%
- B- 1 · 2.4%
- I 1 of 42
Percentages are of the 41 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: incompletes (I).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Fall 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOE, MICHELE LOUISE reviews ↗ | 3.77 | 3.77 | 653 | 16 | 84% | average | Closed |
| PRESCOTT-JOHNSON, TARA L reviews ↗ | 3.67 | 3.67 | 559 | 10 | 75% | light | not teaching it |
| KIPEN, DAVID MORRIS reviews ↗ | 3.50 | 3.50 | 531 | 11 | 56% | light | Waitlist, 0 of 10 places taken |
| WARTANIAN, RAFFI J reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.56 | 514 | 12 | 63% | very light | Waitlist, 1 of 10 places taken |
| DEUEL, NATHAN A reviews ↗ | 3.83 | 3.83 | 407 | 10 | 87% | average | Closed |
| MARTINEZ, ANDREW M reviews ↗ | 3.83 | 3.84 | 389 | 9 | 88% | very light | not teaching it |
| CHICHESTER, TEDDI LYNN reviews ↗ | 3.80 | 3.81 | 330 | 5 | 87% | average | Closed |
| SUSSMAN, DANIEL BENJAMIN reviews ↗ | 3.73 | 3.74 | 325 | 10 | 80% | light | Waitlist, 0 of 10 places taken |
| MEHDIZADEH, NEDDA reviews ↗ | 3.65 | 3.65 | 317 | 7 | 75% | heavy | Waitlist, 0 of 10 places taken |
| POPHAM, SHELBY A reviews ↗ | 2.73 | 2.68 | 310 | 7 | 19% | heavy | not teaching it |
| PAGE, GABRIEL B reviews ↗ | 3.78 | 3.79 | 243 | 5 | 87% | very light | Waitlist, 2 of 10 places taken |
| FALLOWS, RANDALL JONATHAN reviews ↗ | 3.68 | 3.68 | 232 | 5 | 73% | average | not teaching it |
| JULIANO, LOGAN reviews ↗ | 3.69 | 3.70 | 227 | 4 | 80% | - | not teaching it |
| CAVANAGH, ROBERT LOFTUS reviews ↗ | 3.57 | 3.57 | 213 | 4 | 69% | light | Closed |
| STONE, BRUCE D reviews ↗ | 2.90 | 2.84 | 200 | 9 | 28% | average | not teaching it |
| JAURRETCHE, COLLEEN M reviews ↗ | 3.60 | 3.60 | 185 | 6 | 68% | light | not teaching it |
| HITCHNER, THOMAS A reviews ↗ | 3.71 | 3.72 | 170 | 5 | 82% | light | not teaching it |
| CHRISTENSEN, TAMAR S reviews ↗ | 3.50 | 3.48 | 159 | 3 | 55% | average | not teaching it |
| HARTENBERGER, LAURA A reviews ↗ | 3.85 | 3.87 | 153 | 5 | 93% | very light | not teaching it |
| LANG, JACOB WARREN reviews ↗ | 3.62 | 3.62 | 149 | 5 | 71% | very light | not teaching it |
| WATSON, DANA CAIRNS reviews ↗ | 3.71 | 3.73 | 116 | 2 | 78% | average | not teaching it |
| GOMEZ, CARLOS RAFAEL reviews ↗ | 3.74 | 3.76 | 67 | 2 | 79% | - | not teaching it |
| SAMUELSON, MARY G reviews ↗ | 3.52 | 3.49 | 67 | 3 | 55% | heavy | not teaching it |
| LISOVSKY, KARL F reviews ↗ | 3.50 | 3.47 | 63 | 2 | 59% | average | not teaching it |
| JULIANO, LINZI MICHEL reviews ↗ | 3.59 | 3.58 | 57 | 2 | 72% | - | not teaching it |
| MANOJLOVIC, MAJA reviews ↗ | 3.80 | 3.86 | 44 | 2 | 86% | average | Waitlist, 2 of 10 places taken |
| DE, ESHA NIYOGI reviews ↗ | 3.78 | 3.84 | 43 | 1 | 93% | average | not teaching it |
| KERN, ANDREA NICOLE reviews ↗ | 3.89 | 4.00 | 43 | 2 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| SPOONER, MARY reviews ↗ | 3.74 | 3.79 | 41 | 1 | 93% | - | not teaching it |
| DICKEY, DOMINIQUA reviews ↗ | 3.72 | 3.76 | 41 | 1 | 83% | light | not teaching it |
| RHODD-LEE, HOLLAND M reviews ↗ | 3.79 | 3.86 | 41 | 2 | 93% | heavy | not teaching it |
| BULLWINKLE, DAVID reviews ↗ | 3.77 | 3.82 | 41 | 1 | 85% | - | Closed |
| RUBINSON, GREGORY J reviews ↗ | 3.43 | 3.35 | 41 | 2 | 56% | heavy | not teaching it |
| SOLIS, SAMANTHA reviews ↗ | 3.87 | 3.97 | 38 | 2 | 97% | - | not teaching it |
| EPPS, JAMES LATIFAH reviews ↗ | 3.88 | 4.00 | 36 | 2 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| CARRASCO, AMANDA reviews ↗ | 3.65 | 3.67 | 22 | 1 | 77% | - | not teaching it |
| VOLLRATH, MATTHEW reviews ↗ | 3.80 | 3.93 | 22 | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| KETAI, RACHEL LEWIS reviews ↗ | 3.62 | 3.61 | 22 | 1 | 77% | - | not teaching it |
| PEITZMAN, FAYE C reviews ↗ | 3.58 | 3.54 | 22 | 1 | 64% | light | not teaching it |
| JOHNSON, DARIEN reviews ↗ | 3.67 | 3.70 | 21 | 1 | 90% | - | not teaching it |
| HOEGBERG, MIRANDA reviews ↗ | 3.66 | 3.69 | 21 | 1 | 71% | - | not teaching it |
| RODRIGUEZ DRISSI, SUSANNAH reviews ↗ | 3.75 | 3.86 | 21 | 1 | 86% | - | not teaching it |
| SHERRER, THOMAS A reviews ↗ | 3.69 | 3.75 | 21 | 1 | 76% | - | not teaching it |
| HOLTEN, CHRISTINE reviews ↗ | 3.46 | 3.31 | 20 | 1 | 50% | - | not teaching it |
| ESCOBEDO, CINDY R reviews ↗ | 3.64 | 3.65 | 20 | 1 | 65% | - | not teaching it |
| PATCHIGONDLA, JADA reviews ↗ | 3.58 | 3.54 | 19 · | 1 | 63% | - | not teaching it |
| FOXX, KIANA reviews ↗ | 3.41 | 3.21 | 19 · | 1 | 53% | - | not teaching it |
| DAVIS, MARGARET ELLEN reviews ↗ | 3.74 | 3.84 | 18 · | 1 | 89% | light | not teaching it |
| MCIVER, MIA LOUISE GROVES reviews ↗ | 3.59 | 3.55 | 16 · | 1 | 69% | average | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
What comes first
The chain dibs can see is 1 course long before ENGCOMP 3. This is a floor, not a deadline: dibs has not read a class page for ENGCOMP 2 and ENGCOMP 2I, so the real chain can only be longer than this, never shorter.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
In Falls
Ran in 5 of the last 5 Falls.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours. Enforced requisite: satisfaction of Entry-Level Writing requirement or course 2 or 2I (C or better). Not open for credit to students with credit for course 3D, 3DS, 3E, or 3SL. Rhetorical techniques and skillful argument. Analysis of varieties of academic prose and writing of minimum of 20 pages of revised text. Completion of course with grade of C or better satisfies Writing I requirement. Letter grading.
Sections in Fall 2026
Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 28 readings. Seat readings are snapshots, not live availability. Their timestamps show when dibs last checked.
-
Lec 1 TR 11:00am-12:15pmClosed3.57predicted, this instructor · 213 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 2 TR 12:30pm-1:45pmClosed3.57predicted, this instructor · 213 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 3 TR 11:00am-12:15pmClosed3.77predicted, this instructor · 41 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 4 TR 12:30pm-1:45pmClosed3.77predicted, this instructor · 41 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 5 TR 8:00am-9:15amClosed3.80predicted, this instructor · 330 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 6 TR 9:30am-10:45amClosed3.80predicted, this instructor · 330 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 7 TR 11:00am-12:15pmClosed3.80predicted, this instructor · 330 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 8 MW 12:30pm-1:45pmClosed by the department
The Staff
3.63predicted, all instructors · 7,329 gradesno enrollment count published no history
-
Lec 9 MW 2:00pm-3:15pmWaitlist3.80predicted, this instructor · 44 grades
2 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 10 TR 11:00am-12:15pmClosed3.77predicted, this instructor · 653 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 11 TR 12:30pm-1:45pmClosed3.77predicted, this instructor · 653 grades
15 of 15 · 6 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 13 MW 9:30am-10:45amWaitlist
Juliano, L.
3.63predicted, all instructors · 7,329 grades0 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 14 MW 11:00am-12:15pmWaitlist
Juliano, L.
3.63predicted, all instructors · 7,329 grades0 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 15 MW 12:30pm-1:45pmWaitlist
Juliano, L.
3.63predicted, all instructors · 7,329 grades2 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 16 MW 3:30pm-4:45pmWaitlist3.73predicted, this instructor · 325 grades
0 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 17 TR 12:30pm-1:45pmClosed3.83predicted, this instructor · 407 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 18 TR 2:00pm-3:15pmClosed3.83predicted, this instructor · 407 grades
15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled high risk
-
Lec 19 MW 11:00am-12:15pmWaitlist3.56predicted, this instructor · 514 grades
1 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 20 MW 12:30pm-1:45pmWaitlist3.56predicted, this instructor · 514 grades
2 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 21 MW 2:00pm-3:15pmWaitlist3.56predicted, this instructor · 514 grades
1 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 22 MW 9:30am-10:45amWaitlist3.78predicted, this instructor · 243 grades
2 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 23 MW 5:00pm-6:15pmWaitlist3.73predicted, this instructor · 325 grades
0 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 24 MW 9:30am-10:45amWaitlist3.65predicted, this instructor · 317 grades
0 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 25 MW 11:00am-12:15pmWaitlist3.65predicted, this instructor · 317 grades
0 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 26 MW 12:30pm-1:45pmWaitlist3.65predicted, this instructor · 317 grades
1 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 28 MW 11:00am-12:15pmWaitlist3.50predicted, this instructor · 531 grades
0 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 29 MW 12:30pm-1:45pmWaitlist3.50predicted, this instructor · 531 grades
1 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
-
Lec 30 MW 2:00pm-3:15pmWaitlist3.50predicted, this instructor · 531 grades
0 of 10 places taken. 22 of 22 enrolled high risk
Final enrollment, averaged across each term's sections: between 20 and 21 a term over 13 terms, summer excluded, most recently 21 in Fall 2025. That is the shape across years, not this term, which is above.
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking ENGCOMP 3 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.
Seats over time in Fall 2026
How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it. This course runs 28 lectures; the legend under the chart picks one.
A dot is a reading where something moved: the seat count, the status, or the waitlist.
What a flat run means, and where a line starts
Flat between dots means it did not drift, it held and then jumped, and a line starts when dibs first saw that lecture rather than reaching back before it existed. A lecture that has never moved draws a flat line across the whole window, and one with two or three readings draws a line joining them, which is too few to read a trend from.
Lec 1 · Cavanagh, R.L. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 2 over about 2 months
Lec 2 · Cavanagh, R.L. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 2 over about 2 months
Lec 3 · Bullwinkle, D. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 3 over about 2 months
Lec 4 · Bullwinkle, D. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 2 over about 2 months
Lec 5 · Chichester, T.L. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 3 over about 2 months
Lec 6 · Chichester, T.L. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 1 over about 2 months
Lec 7 · Chichester, T.L. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 2 over about 2 months
Lec 8 · The Staff · -
Freed 13 seats over about 2 months
Lec 9 · Manojlovic, M. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 9 over about 2 months
Lec 10 · Moe, M.L. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 1 over about 2 months
Lec 11 · Moe, M.L. · 15 of 15 · 6 over enrolled
Filled by 3 over about 2 months
Lec 13 · Juliano, L. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 11 over about 2 months
Lec 14 · Juliano, L. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 12 over about 2 months
Lec 15 · Juliano, L. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 13 over about 2 months
Lec 16 · Sussman, D.B. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 10 over about 2 months
Lec 17 · Deuel, N.A. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 1 over about 2 months
Lec 18 · Deuel, N.A. · 15 of 15 · 7 over enrolled
Filled by 1 over about 2 months
Lec 19 · Wartanian, R.J. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 9 over about 2 months
Lec 20 · Wartanian, R.J. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 10 over about 2 months
Lec 21 · Wartanian, R.J. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 9 over about 2 months
Lec 22 · Page, G.B. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 9 over about 2 months
Lec 23 · Sussman, D.B. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 11 over about 2 months
Lec 24 · Mehdizadeh, N. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 14 over about 2 months
Lec 25 · Mehdizadeh, N. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 18 over about 2 months
Lec 26 · Mehdizadeh, N. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 13 over about 2 months
Lec 28 · Kipen, D.M. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 18 over about 2 months
Lec 29 · Kipen, D.M. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 16 over about 2 months
Lec 30 · Kipen, D.M. · 22 of 22 enrolled
Filled by 9 over about 2 months
How readings and alerts work
A reading and an hourly record are different things, and most charts here hold more of the second missing than present. dibs has taken readings of a section since long before it began keeping an hour-by-hour log of when it looked, so the empty stretches are dibs saying it was not keeping that log yet, not that it looked and found nothing. That is the age of the record and not a fault.
Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.
The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.