Skip to content
dibs
Menu
Fall 2026 Change term ▾
Spring 2027 Winter 2027 Fall 2026 Summer Session C 2026 Summer Session A 2026 Spring 2026 Winter 2026 Fall 2025
Sign in

FILM TV 4

Introduction to Art and Technique of Filmmaking

5 units Literary and Cultural Analysis Visual and Performance Arts Analysis and Practice

Sections & times

Lecture and discussion.

Fall 2026: 1 lecture and 10 discussions. Nothing here is open. The oldest of these readings was 22 minutes ago.

Grades

3.79

Average grade awarded in FILM TV 4. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.

In the A range

88%

of the 3,564 letter grades

D, F or W

1.7%

of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals

Taken pass/no pass

4%

91% of those passed

The registrar's own records: 3,564 grades over 14 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.

What is inside that record

4 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.

The table below splits them, and term averages across those 14 terms ran 3.64 to 4.00.

Historical grades for WAGMISTER, CARLOS, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.

  • A+ 289 · 66.3%
  • A 134 · 30.7%
  • A- 12 · 2.8%
  • B- 1 · 0.2%
  • P 4 of 441
  • S 1 of 441

Percentages are of the 436 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P) and satisfactory (S).

How the non-letter outcomes are counted

They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.

By instructor

Predicted GPA, raw average, sample size, terms, A range and the workload reviewers reported for every instructor with a grade record in this course
Instructor Predicted GPA Raw n Terms A range Workload Fall 2026
TRICE, JASMINE NADUA reviews ↗ 3.75 3.75 1,802 6 85% average not teaching it
HUANG, GEORGE J reviews ↗ 3.83 3.83 474 2 88% very light not teaching it
WAGMISTER, CARLOS reviews ↗ 3.98 3.99 436 2 100% - Closed
RAVETTO, KRISTINE SUZANNE reviews ↗ 3.73 3.73 404 2 85% - not teaching it
MAQUILING, DAVID MARK reviews ↗ 3.84 3.84 222 1 90% - not teaching it
VILLAREJO, AMY reviews ↗ 3.83 3.84 194 1 90% - not teaching it
MINKOVA, SLAVEYA reviews ↗ 3.68 3.67 192 1 82% - not teaching it
GREENE, SHELLEEN MAISHA reviews ↗ 3.29 3.03 32 2 53% - not teaching it
Why Predicted is not the Raw average

“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.

Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.

Reviews for FILM TV 4

Workload and assignments

Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.

dibs has read this course’s reviews and none of them say what kind of work it sets, so dibs has nothing to show rather than a guess. Read from 74 reviews about 1 month ago. That is the reviewers being silent, and not a course that sets no work.

Read the source reviews

In Falls

Ran in 5 of the last 5 Falls.

From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.

From the registrar's catalog

Lecture, four hours; discussion, one hour. Students acquire understanding of practical and aesthetic challenges undertaken by artists and professionals in making of motion pictures and television. Examination of film as both art and industry: storytelling, sound and visual design, casting and performance, editing, finance, advertising, and distribution. Exploration of American and world cinema from filmmaker's perspective. Honing of analytical skills and development of critical vocabulary for study of filmmaking as technical, artistic, and cultural phenomenon. P/NP or letter grading.

Sections in Fall 2026

You enroll in the discussion, not the lecture, so a discussion's status is the one that decides whether you get in. A lecture can read open while every discussion under it is full.

Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 11 readings. Seat readings are snapshots, not live availability. Their timestamps show when dibs last checked.

Final enrollment, averaged across each term's sections: between 113 and 267 a term over 10 terms, summer excluded, most recently 198 in Fall 2025. That is the shape across years, not this term, which is above.

From the people who took it

Student reviews

What taking FILM TV 4 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.

Write a review

Your experience could be the first.

No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.

Looking for more perspectives?

External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.

Read reviews on BruinWalk

Community guidelines

Seats over time in Fall 2026

How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it.

A dot is a reading where something moved: the seat count, the status, or the waitlist.

What a flat run means, and where a line starts

Flat between dots means it did not drift, it held and then jumped, and a line starts when dibs first saw that lecture rather than reaching back before it existed. A lecture that has never moved draws a flat line across the whole window, and one with two or three readings draws a line joining them, which is too few to read a trend from.

Lec 1 · Wagmister, C. · 200 of 200 enrolled

Filled by 87 over about 2 months

200 of 200 · no seats left in its discussions
17 Aug 12:329 Sep 05:321 Oct 22:32
dibs read 168 of the 543 hours its hourly record covers, 31%, and did not look in 375. dibs had no hourly record before 9 Sep, which is the other 548 of 1091 plotted.200 of 200 enrolled at the newest reading, 22 minutes ago, and no seats left in its discussions. Seats from 17 Aug 12:32 to 1 Oct 22:32, 113 to 200. dibs read 168 of the 543 hours its hourly record here covers, 31%. An hour marked as read confirms a check, not continuous monitoring. That check recorded no change; changes between checks may be missed. For 375 hours dibs was keeping a record and did not reach this section. Nothing before 9 September at 08:00, where this section's record starts, has a read either way, which is 548 hours of this window. Where the drawing is faint or broken, that never means the readings are doubtful. It means the stretch between them is unaccounted for.
How readings and alerts work

A reading and an hourly record are different things, and most charts here hold more of the second missing than present. dibs has taken readings of a section since long before it began keeping an hour-by-hour log of when it looked, so the empty stretches are dibs saying it was not keeping that log yet, not that it looked and found nothing. That is the age of the record and not a fault.

Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.

The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.