Skip to content
dibs

Life Sciences

Scientific Inquiry 91 GE courses 42 sections offered in Fall 2026 25 you can take and 17 dibs cannot tell about, each marked on its row
  1. 1
  2. 2

    STATS 13 Introduction to Statistical Methods for Life and Health Sciences


    3.54 predicted, this instructor · 309 grades · 1 term
    70 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Open, 46 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, all open.

  3. 3

    LIFESCI 15 Life: Concepts and Issues

    3.39 predicted, this instructor · 3,594 grades · 12 terms
    52 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Open, 41 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 16 discussions, 8 open.

    2 exams, said by 3 reviewers4 quizzes, said by 3 reviewersProblem sets mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers

  4. 4

    STATS 13 Introduction to Statistical Methods for Life and Health Sciences


    3.20 predicted, this instructor · 71 grades · 1 term
    46 in 100 got an A minus or better · 10 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Open, 26 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, 3 open: Dis 5A, MW 1:00pm-1:50pm, Dis 5C, MW 3:00pm-3:50pm, and Dis 5D, MW 4:00pm-4:50pm.

  5. 5

    CLUSTER M71A Biotechnology and Society


    3.85 predicted, this instructor · 1,031 grades · 4 terms
    89 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Open, 2 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, 2 open: Dis 1I, R 4:00pm-5:50pm, and Dis 1J, W 2:00pm-3:50pm. high risk

    2 exams, said by 3 reviewers1 paper, said by 2 reviewers

    Also listed as SOC GEN M71A (closed by the department, standing limit): the same class, listed once here. Each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record, and the figures on this row are CLUSTER M71A's.

  6. 6
  7. 7

    CLUSTER 73A Brain, Bodymind, and Society: All in Your Head?


    3.79 predicted, this instructor · 263 grades · 1 term
    85 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Open, 6 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, 3 open: Dis 1F, F 4:00pm-5:50pm, Dis 1H, F 6:00pm-7:50pm, and Dis 1J, F 6:00pm-7:50pm. high risk

    Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 7 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 4 reviewers

  8. 8
  9. 9

    CLUSTER M72A Sex from Biology to Gendered Society


    3.70 predicted, this instructor · 667 grades · 4 terms
    76 in 100 got an A minus or better · Fewer than 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Open, 2 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 8 discussions, 2 open: Dis 1E, T 4:00pm-5:50pm, and Dis 1F, T 6:00pm-7:50pm. high risk

    Also listed as COMM M72A, SOC GEN M72A, SOCIOL M72A: the same class, and each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record.

  10. 10
  11. 11

    STATS 13 Introduction to Statistical Methods for Life and Health Sciences


    3.54 predicted, this instructor · 309 grades · 1 term
    70 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Open, 4 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, 1 open: Dis 3A, TR 9:00am-9:50am. high risk

  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    STATS 10 Introduction to Statistical Reasoning


    3.43 predicted, this instructor · 3,267 grades · 13 terms
    67 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Open, 1 seat left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, 1 open: Dis 2A, MW 9:00am-9:50am. high risk

  15. 15

    STATS 10 Introduction to Statistical Reasoning


    3.42 predicted, this instructor · 59 grades · 1 term
    63 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Open, 23 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, 2 open: Dis 5A, TR 9:00am-9:50am, and Dis 5B, TR 10:00am-10:50am. high risk

  16. 16

    STATS 10 Introduction to Statistical Reasoning


    3.50 predicted, this instructor · 2,390 grades · 9 terms
    65 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed by the department. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

  17. 17

    STATS 10 Introduction to Statistical Reasoning


    3.50 predicted, this instructor · 2,390 grades · 9 terms
    65 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed by the department. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

  18. 18

    EPS SCI 3 Astrobiology

    3.76 predicted, this instructor · 858 grades · 2 terms
    83 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Waitlist, 3 of 15 places taken. Seats counted across its open discussions. 15 discussions, none open. The way in is the lecture's waitlist, at 3 of 15.

    2 exams, said by 8 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 2 reviewers8 problem sets, said by 8 reviewers

  19. 19

    CLUSTER M1A Food: Lens for Environment and Sustainability


    3.89 predicted, all instructors · 937 grades · 5 terms
    94 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    Also listed as ENVIRON M1A: the same class, and each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record.

  20. 20

    PSYCTRY 79 Applied Positive Neuroscience: Skills for Improving Productivity and Well-Being

    3.83 predicted, this instructor · 1,725 grades · 9 terms
    89 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 6 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    2 exams, said by 2 reviewers1 paper, said by 6 reviewers

  21. 21

    PHYSCI 5 Issues in Human Physiology: Diet and Exercise

    3.71 predicted, this instructor · 4,083 grades · 16 terms
    78 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 15 discussions, 3 open: Dis 1J, M 3:00pm-4:50pm, Dis 1K, T 8:00am-9:50am, and Dis 1N, W 3:00pm-4:50pm. Lecture reads closed, so its 3 open discussions cannot be reached from here. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    2 exams, said by 9 reviewers1 quiz, said by 7 reviewers

  22. 22

    CLUSTER 70A Evolution of Cosmos and Life


    3.65 predicted, this instructor · 1,062 grades · 4 terms
    74 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

  23. 23
  24. 24

    GEOG 7 Introduction to Geographic Information Systems

    3.63 predicted, all instructors · 2,186 grades · 15 terms
    77 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 24 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 6 reviewers

  25. 25

    CLUSTER 80A Frontiers in Human Aging


    3.59 predicted, this instructor · 455 grades · 3 terms
    69 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 6 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 7 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 10 reviewers

  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28

    STATS 13 Introduction to Statistical Methods for Life and Health Sciences


    3.56 predicted, this instructor · 1,444 grades · 6 terms
    66 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

  29. 29

    STATS 13 Introduction to Statistical Methods for Life and Health Sciences


    3.56 predicted, this instructor · 1,444 grades · 6 terms
    66 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

  30. 30
  31. 31

    NEUROSC 10 Brain Made Simple: Neuroscience for 21st Century

    3.51 predicted, all instructors · 404 grades · 7 terms
    69 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed.

    3 exams, said by 7 reviewers4 problem sets, said by 3 reviewers

  32. 32
  33. 33

    STATS 10 Introduction to Statistical Reasoning


    3.43 predicted, this instructor · 3,267 grades · 13 terms
    67 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

  34. 34

    LIFESCI 30A Mathematics for Life Scientists

    3.40 predicted, this instructor · 3,645 grades · 6 terms
    64 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 12 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers

  35. 35

    LIFESCI 30A Mathematics for Life Scientists

    3.40 predicted, this instructor · 3,645 grades · 6 terms
    64 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers

  36. 36

    LIFESCI 30A Mathematics for Life Scientists

    3.40 predicted, all instructors · 8,226 grades · 13 terms
    64 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 12 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers

  37. 37

    LIFESCI 30A Mathematics for Life Scientists

    3.40 predicted, all instructors · 8,226 grades · 13 terms
    64 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers

  38. 38
  39. 39

    LIFESCI 30A Mathematics for Life Scientists

    2.96 predicted, this instructor · 636 grades · 1 term
    48 in 100 got an A minus or better · 13 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers

  40. 40

    LIFESCI 30A Mathematics for Life Scientists

    2.96 predicted, this instructor · 636 grades · 1 term
    48 in 100 got an A minus or better · 13 in 100 took a D, F or W

    Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers

  41. 2 courses dibs cannot rank

    The registrar has published no grades for these, so there is nothing to rank them on. That is dibs saying it cannot tell, not that they grade badly. They sit outside the order above, not at the bottom of it. Everything else on these rows is read the same way as the 40 above.

  42. COMM M72A Sex from Biology to Gendered Society

    No grades on record, so dibs cannot rank this one.

    Closed by the department. Seats counted across its open discussions. 8 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    Also listed as SOC GEN M72A (closed by the department), SOCIOL M72A (closed by the department): the same class, listed once here. Each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record, and the figures on this row are COMM M72A's.

  43. ENVIRON M1A Food: Lens for Environment and Sustainability


    No grades on record, so dibs cannot rank this one.

    Closed by the department. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.

    Quizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers

    Also listed as CLUSTER M1A: the same class, and each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record.

Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 42 readings. Seat readings are snapshots, not live availability. Their timestamps show when dibs last checked.

Where a course has discussions, the discussion is what you enroll in.

The exam, paper, quiz and problem set marks come from what reviewers wrote, and a mark reaches a row here only where at least two of them said the same thing. A blank means nobody said, which is not the same as none: where a reviewer said there were none, the row says none. A mark carrying ×? is a kind reviewers wrote about without any of them giving a number, which is not the same as none either.

Balanced puts most of the weight on the grade record, then on how full the section is now, then on whether it was open at the last reading. Grades, Seat odds and Open first each lean the whole way onto one of those.

The ranking is meant to be arguable rather than handed down. These four chips are its corners: w_gpa, w_fill and w_open in the address bar take any weights you like, and a link carrying them can be shared.

Seat risk combines how full the section is now with how large the course has historically run. Reserved-seat restrictions are not parsed yet, so risk is a tier rather than a percentage: a section can read “94 spots left” with most of them held for a major.

Always check MyUCLA before you enroll. dibs holds nothing and cannot move you up a list. If MyUCLA disagrees with this page, MyUCLA is right.

Sections limited to a particular year are marked in the list, not hidden, because you have not said what year you are.

I am a

Used to check enrollment restrictions for this list. Choose "Rather not say" to clear this filter.

Saving remembers this choice on this device and your account for future lists and alerts.