GEOG 2 Biodiversity in Changing World
3.41 predicted, this instructor · 148 grades · 2 terms
62 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 46 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, 6 open.
3.41 predicted, this instructor · 148 grades · 2 terms
62 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 46 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, 6 open.
3.54 predicted, this instructor · 309 grades · 1 term
70 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 46 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, all open.
3.39 predicted, this instructor · 3,594 grades · 12 terms
52 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 41 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 16 discussions, 8 open.
2 exams, said by 3 reviewers4 quizzes, said by 3 reviewersProblem sets mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
3.20 predicted, this instructor · 71 grades · 1 term
46 in 100 got an A minus or better · 10 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 26 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, 3 open: Dis 5A, MW 1:00pm-1:50pm, Dis 5C, MW 3:00pm-3:50pm, and Dis 5D, MW 4:00pm-4:50pm.
3.85 predicted, this instructor · 1,031 grades · 4 terms
89 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 2 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, 2 open: Dis 1I, R 4:00pm-5:50pm, and Dis 1J, W 2:00pm-3:50pm. high risk
2 exams, said by 3 reviewers1 paper, said by 2 reviewers
Also listed as SOC GEN M71A (closed by the department, standing limit): the same class, listed once here. Each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record, and the figures on this row are CLUSTER M71A's.
3.83 predicted, all instructors · 1,132 grades · 5 terms
89 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 14 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 12 discussions, 4 open: Lab 1F, F 9:00am-10:50am, Lab 1I, R 8:00am-9:50am, Lab 1L, M 4:00pm-5:50pm, and Lab 1M, W 2:00pm-3:50pm. high risk
3.79 predicted, this instructor · 263 grades · 1 term
85 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 6 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, 3 open: Dis 1F, F 4:00pm-5:50pm, Dis 1H, F 6:00pm-7:50pm, and Dis 1J, F 6:00pm-7:50pm. high risk
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 7 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 4 reviewers
3.77 predicted, this instructor · 987 grades · 9 terms
84 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 2 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 6 discussions, 2 open: Dis 1C, R 3:00pm-3:50pm, and Dis 1E, F 10:00am-10:50am. high risk
3.70 predicted, this instructor · 667 grades · 4 terms
76 in 100 got an A minus or better · Fewer than 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 2 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 8 discussions, 2 open: Dis 1E, T 4:00pm-5:50pm, and Dis 1F, T 6:00pm-7:50pm. high risk
Also listed as COMM M72A, SOC GEN M72A, SOCIOL M72A: the same class, and each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record.
3.65 predicted, this instructor · 911 grades · 5 terms
77 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 1 seat left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, 1 open: Lab 1A, F 9:00am-9:50am. high risk
3.54 predicted, this instructor · 309 grades · 1 term
70 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 4 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, 1 open: Dis 3A, TR 9:00am-9:50am. high risk
3.51 predicted, this instructor · 2,661 grades · 8 terms
65 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 1 seat left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 16 discussions, 1 open: Dis 5J, R 8:00am-9:15am. high risk
3.49 predicted, this instructor · 727 grades · 5 terms
63 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 1 seat left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, 1 open: Dis 1C, F 3:00pm-3:50pm. high risk
3.43 predicted, this instructor · 3,267 grades · 13 terms
67 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 1 seat left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, 1 open: Dis 2A, MW 9:00am-9:50am. high risk
3.42 predicted, this instructor · 59 grades · 1 term
63 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 23 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, 2 open: Dis 5A, TR 9:00am-9:50am, and Dis 5B, TR 10:00am-10:50am. high risk
3.50 predicted, this instructor · 2,390 grades · 9 terms
65 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed by the department. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.50 predicted, this instructor · 2,390 grades · 9 terms
65 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed by the department. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.76 predicted, this instructor · 858 grades · 2 terms
83 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Waitlist, 3 of 15 places taken. Seats counted across its open discussions. 15 discussions, none open. The way in is the lecture's waitlist, at 3 of 15.
2 exams, said by 8 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 2 reviewers8 problem sets, said by 8 reviewers
3.89 predicted, all instructors · 937 grades · 5 terms
94 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
Also listed as ENVIRON M1A: the same class, and each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record.
3.83 predicted, this instructor · 1,725 grades · 9 terms
89 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 6 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2 exams, said by 2 reviewers1 paper, said by 6 reviewers
3.71 predicted, this instructor · 4,083 grades · 16 terms
78 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 15 discussions, 3 open: Dis 1J, M 3:00pm-4:50pm, Dis 1K, T 8:00am-9:50am, and Dis 1N, W 3:00pm-4:50pm. Lecture reads closed, so its 3 open discussions cannot be reached from here. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2 exams, said by 9 reviewers1 quiz, said by 7 reviewers
3.65 predicted, this instructor · 1,062 grades · 4 terms
74 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.65 predicted, this instructor · 4,090 grades · 9 terms
76 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 12 discussions, none open. Its waitlist is full too, at 60 of 60.
3.63 predicted, all instructors · 2,186 grades · 15 terms
77 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 24 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 6 reviewers
3.59 predicted, this instructor · 455 grades · 3 terms
69 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 6 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 7 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 10 reviewers
3.59 predicted, this instructor · 3,203 grades · 7 terms
71 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 14 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.59 predicted, this instructor · 3,203 grades · 7 terms
71 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 14 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.56 predicted, this instructor · 1,444 grades · 6 terms
66 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.56 predicted, this instructor · 1,444 grades · 6 terms
66 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.52 predicted, this instructor · 1,537 grades · 7 terms
65 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 16 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.51 predicted, all instructors · 404 grades · 7 terms
69 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed.
3 exams, said by 7 reviewers4 problem sets, said by 3 reviewers
3.51 predicted, this instructor · 2,661 grades · 8 terms
65 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 14 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.43 predicted, this instructor · 3,267 grades · 13 terms
67 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.40 predicted, this instructor · 3,645 grades · 6 terms
64 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 12 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
3.40 predicted, this instructor · 3,645 grades · 6 terms
64 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
3.40 predicted, all instructors · 8,226 grades · 13 terms
64 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 12 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
3.40 predicted, all instructors · 8,226 grades · 13 terms
64 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
3.31 predicted, this instructor · 2,068 grades · 6 terms
51 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 14 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2.96 predicted, this instructor · 636 grades · 1 term
48 in 100 got an A minus or better · 13 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
2.96 predicted, this instructor · 636 grades · 1 term
48 in 100 got an A minus or better · 13 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2 exams, said by 2 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
The registrar has published no grades for these, so there is nothing to rank them on. That is dibs saying it cannot tell, not that they grade badly. They sit outside the order above, not at the bottom of it. Everything else on these rows is read the same way as the 40 above.
No grades on record, so dibs cannot rank this one.
Closed by the department. Seats counted across its open discussions. 8 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
Also listed as SOC GEN M72A (closed by the department), SOCIOL M72A (closed by the department): the same class, listed once here. Each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record, and the figures on this row are COMM M72A's.
No grades on record, so dibs cannot rank this one.
Closed by the department. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
Quizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
Also listed as CLUSTER M1A: the same class, and each listing holds its own seats and its own grade record.
Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 42 readings. Seat readings are snapshots, not live availability. Their timestamps show when dibs last checked.
Where a course has discussions, the discussion is what you enroll in.
The exam, paper, quiz and problem set marks come from what reviewers wrote, and a mark reaches a row here only where at least two of them said the same thing. A blank means nobody said, which is not the same as none: where a reviewer said there were none, the row says none. A mark carrying ×? is a kind reviewers wrote about without any of them giving a number, which is not the same as none either.
Balanced puts most of the weight on the grade record, then on how full the section is now, then on whether it was open at the last reading. Grades, Seat odds and Open first each lean the whole way onto one of those.
The ranking is meant to be arguable rather than handed down. These four chips are its corners: w_gpa, w_fill and w_open in the address bar take any weights you like, and a link carrying them can be shared.
Seat risk combines how full the section is now with how large the course has historically run. Reserved-seat restrictions are not parsed yet, so risk is a tier rather than a percentage: a section can read “94 spots left” with most of them held for a major.
Always check MyUCLA before you enroll. dibs holds nothing and cannot move you up a list. If MyUCLA disagrees with this page, MyUCLA is right.
Sections limited to a particular year are marked in the list, not hidden, because you have not said what year you are.
Used to check enrollment restrictions for this list. Choose "Rather not say" to clear this filter.
Saving remembers this choice on this device and your account for future lists and alerts.