COMPTNG 10A
Introduction to Programming
Grades
3.33
Average grade awarded in COMPTNG 10A. Not a rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
60%
of the 3,214 letter grades
D, F or W
5.9%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
3%
80% of those passed
The registrar's own records: 3,214 grades over 14 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025, summer excluded. Every instructor is pooled here. The table below splits them, and term averages across those 14 terms ran 2.99 to 3.57.
- A+ 218 · 6.8%
- A 1,243 · 38.7%
- A- 465 · 14.5%
- B+ 301 · 9.4%
- B 303 · 9.4%
- B- 192 · 6.0%
- C+ 100 · 3.1%
- C 152 · 4.7%
- C- 53 · 1.6%
- D+ 31 · 1.0%
- D 58 · 1.8%
- D- 9 · 0.3%
- F 89 · 2.8%
- P 80 of 3,356
- NP 20 of 3,356
- S 1 of 3,356
- I 36 of 3,356
- NR 3 of 3,356
- DR 2 of 3,356
Percentages are of the 3,214 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P), no-passes (NP), satisfactory (S), incompletes (I), no report (NR), and withdrawals (DR). They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication. Withdrawals are the exception to "excluded": DR is not scored, but it IS counted in the D, F or W figure above, which is reported over the letter grades plus the withdrawals. Pass/no pass and S/U outcomes are outside that figure on both sides.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Winter 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU, WEIQI reviews ↗ | 3.31 | 3.31 | 583 | 5 | 59% | light | not teaching it |
| LIU, SHU reviews ↗ | 3.74 | 3.76 | 316 | 3 | 85% | - | not teaching it |
| ZHANG, MINXIN reviews ↗ | 3.35 | 3.35 | 297 | 4 | 61% | - | not teaching it |
| LU, JIAYIN reviews ↗ | 3.59 | 3.61 | 245 | 2 | 82% | - | not teaching it |
| LIU, SITING reviews ↗ | 3.07 | 3.05 | 242 | 2 | 45% | - | not teaching it |
| BURNETT, SARAH CASSIE reviews ↗ | 3.37 | 3.37 | 220 | 2 | 55% | heavy | not teaching it |
| ANDREWS, MICHAEL JOSEPH reviews ↗ | 3.30 | 3.29 | 219 | 3 | 58% | average | not teaching it |
| DING, LINGYUN reviews ↗ | 3.28 | 3.28 | 200 | 2 | 59% | - | not teaching it |
| KASHEFI, ALI reviews ↗ | 3.42 | 3.43 | 174 | 3 | 70% | - | not teaching it |
| YANG, LIU reviews ↗ | 3.25 | 3.24 | 162 | 1 | 56% | - | not teaching it |
| ALEXANDR, YULIA reviews ↗ | 3.06 | 3.03 | 152 | 2 | 38% | heavy | not teaching it |
| KEATING, LEAH reviews ↗ | 2.98 | 2.93 | 125 | 2 | 44% | - | not teaching it |
| MURRAY, MICHAEL JAMES reviews ↗ | 3.25 | 3.23 | 101 | 1 | 50% | - | not teaching it |
| FENG, XUE reviews ↗ | 3.26 | 3.24 | 66 | 1 | 47% | - | not teaching it |
| PARK, YESOM reviews ↗ | 3.37 | 3.38 | 58 | 1 | 50% | - | not teaching it |
| LYU, LIYAO reviews ↗ | 3.23 | 3.20 | 54 | 1 | 43% | - | not teaching it |
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
dibs measures outcomes: grades, seats, how fast a class fills. For what a class is like to sit in, BruinWalk has the reviews.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for COMPTNG 10A, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
In Winters
Ran in 4 of the last 4 Winters.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
dibs has not read the registrar's description for this course. It reads them for general education courses only, so this says nothing about the course. Any section below links out to the registrar, where the catalog text is, and that text is also where a prerequisite the structured list does not carry would be written.