EC ENGR M116C / SEHATBAKHSH, NADER

Computer Systems Architecture

How EC ENGR M116C grades when SEHATBAKHSH, NADER teaches it. EC ENGR M116C, every instructor SEHATBAKHSH, NADER, every course

Grades, this instructor

3.74adjusted historical GPA, this instructor

1,225 letter grades across 5 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. The course pools every instructor at 3.74 over 1,225 letter grades.

Raw average: 3.74; The mean of this instructor's recorded letter grades in this course.
In the A range: 81.4%; A+, A and A minus out of 1225 letter grades.
D, F or W: 1.3%; D-range and F grades plus withdrawals, divided by letter grades plus withdrawals.
Taken pass/no pass: 0%; No pass/no-pass outcomes are recorded.

Grade distribution

A+239 / 19.5%
A579 / 47.3%
A-179 / 14.6%
B+96 / 7.8%
B71 / 5.8%
B-19 / 1.6%
C+4 / 0.3%
C21 / 1.7%
C-1 / 0.1%
D+0 / 0%
D10 / 0.8%
D-0 / 0%
F6 / 0.5%

Percentages are of the 1,225 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes. They are excluded from GPA.

Term by term

Raw averages for the terms in this record. A missing term does not establish that this instructor did not teach it. Summer sessions are included when present.

Dashed line: course average across all instructors, 3.74.

One recorded instructorCo-taught, grades shared

Fall 20213.92146 letter grades.

Fall 20223.79161 letter grades.

Fall 20233.76260 letter grades.

Fall 20243.74333 letter grades.

Fall 20253.61325 letter grades.

Is one term a guide to the next?

Across the measured corpus, the same course and instructor's term averages were strongly correlated, including terms several years apart. That is why the adjustment does not weight recent terms more heavily. This is a dataset-wide pattern, not a promise about this instructor's next class.

Teaching it in Fall 2026

No sections are confirmed under this instructor's record in the course listing dibs read for Fall 2026.

Every EC ENGR M116C section and instructor

Reading these figures

Raw is the mean of the recorded letter grades. The adjusted historical GPA pulls an instructor's average toward the course's adjusted average, which itself uses a department prior. It is a comparison aid, not a calibrated prediction or a student rating. Small samples carry more uncertainty. All recorded instructor roles are included, and a section is counted only once for this instructor. Grades cannot establish workload or explain why outcomes differed.

What students say

dibs measures outcomes. For students' experiences of the class, BruinWalk has reviews.

Reviews for SEHATBAKHSH, NADER in EC ENGR M116C