EDUC 498A
Directed Field Experience
Grades
3.97
Average grade awarded in EDUC 498A. Not a rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
97%
of the 664 letter grades
D, F or W
0.0%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
1%
7 of 7 students passed
The registrar's own records: 664 grades over 8 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025, summer excluded. Every instructor is pooled here. The table below splits them, and term averages across those 8 terms ran 3.95 to 3.99.
- A+ 127 · 19.1%
- A 504 · 75.9%
- A- 14 · 2.1%
- B+ 10 · 1.5%
- B 6 · 0.9%
- B- 2 · 0.3%
- C 1 · 0.2%
- P 7 of 795
- S 120 of 795
- I 3 of 795
- NR 1 of 795
Percentages are of the 664 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P), satisfactory (S), incompletes (I), and no report (NR). They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Winter 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KERSEY, SARA E reviews ↗ | 4.00 | 4.00 | 138 | 5 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| PELIKHOVA, JULIA reviews ↗ | 3.90 | 3.89 | 125 | 5 | 91% | - | not teaching it |
| LOPEZ, EDUARDO F reviews ↗ | 4.00 | 4.00 | 110 | 5 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| ALBER, REBECCA L reviews ↗ | 3.99 | 4.00 | 62 | 4 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| ROYSTER, MARKEITH ARENTHEO reviews ↗ | 3.99 | 4.00 | 61 | 4 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| WILSON, CHRISTINE H reviews ↗ | 3.99 | 4.00 | 42 | 3 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| SAGUN, THEODORE RUIZ reviews ↗ | 3.99 | 4.00 | 41 | 3 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| PARK, JAIME JISUN reviews ↗ | 3.86 | 3.81 | 41 | 4 | 80% | - | not teaching it |
| CUE, ZACHARY reviews ↗ | 3.99 | 4.00 | 28 | 2 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| RAFI, FATEMEH HANI reviews ↗ | 3.98 | 4.00 | 16 · small sample | 4 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| ROMERO, ANA LILIA reviews ↗ | 3.98 | 4.00 | 16 · small sample | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| NAVA-LANDEROS, IMELDA reviews ↗ | 3.97 | 3.98 | 14 · small sample | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| LONON, ELSA reviews ↗ | 3.98 | 4.00 | 12 · small sample | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| ARIAS, MELISSA SACHI reviews ↗ | S/U | 0 · small sample | 3 | - | - | not teaching it | |
| LEE, DARLENE O reviews ↗ | S/U | 0 · small sample | 3 | - | - | not teaching it | |
| KIM, JANE WHANG reviews ↗ | P/NP | 0 · small sample | 1 | - | - | not teaching it |
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
dibs measures outcomes: grades, seats, how fast a class fills. For what a class is like to sit in, BruinWalk has the reviews.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for EDUC 498A, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
In Winters
Has not run in Winter in the 4 Winters dibs holds records for, back to Fall 2021. That is 4 years of grade records rather than the course catalog, so it says what has happened and not what the department will do next.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
dibs has not read the registrar's description for this course. It reads them for general education courses only, so this says nothing about the course. Any section below links out to the registrar, where the catalog text is, and that text is also where a prerequisite the structured list does not carry would be written.