Skip to content
dibs

MATH 131A

Analysis

4 units

Lecture and discussion. The registrar has published a final exam time.

Fall 2026: 1 lecture and 4 discussions. Nothing here is open. The oldest of these readings was 3 hours ago.

Grades

2.96

Average grade awarded in MATH 131A. Not a rating: this is what the grades were.

In the A range

38%

of the 2,121 letter grades

D, F or W

8.0%

of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals

Taken pass/no pass

1%

7 of 11 students passed

The registrar's own records: 2,121 grades over 15 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025, summer excluded. Every instructor is pooled here. The table below splits them, and term averages across those 15 terms ran 1.01 to 3.23.

  • A+ 130 · 6.1%
  • A 445 · 21.0%
  • A- 230 · 10.8%
  • B+ 244 · 11.5%
  • B 268 · 12.6%
  • B- 220 · 10.4%
  • C+ 143 · 6.7%
  • C 155 · 7.3%
  • C- 117 · 5.5%
  • D+ 22 · 1.0%
  • D 41 · 1.9%
  • D- 16 · 0.8%
  • F 90 · 4.2%
  • P 7 of 2,137
  • NP 4 of 2,137
  • S 2 of 2,137
  • I 2 of 2,137
  • DR 1 of 2,137

Percentages are of the 2,121 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P), no-passes (NP), satisfactory (S), incompletes (I), and withdrawals (DR). They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication. Withdrawals are the exception to "excluded": DR is not scored, but it IS counted in the D, F or W figure above, which is reported over the letter grades plus the withdrawals. Pass/no pass and S/U outcomes are outside that figure on both sides.

By instructor

Predicted GPA, raw average, sample size, terms, A range and the workload reviewers reported for every instructor with a grade record in this course
Instructor Predicted GPA Raw n Terms A range Workload Fall 2026
XU, PETER reviews ↗ 2.80 2.79 217 6 29% - Closed
YANEZ ETCHEBERRY, JOSE reviews ↗ 2.79 2.77 150 3 32% - not teaching it
DING, CHANGYING reviews ↗ 3.02 3.03 150 4 39% - not teaching it
ZHAO, ZIWEN reviews ↗ 3.14 3.16 137 3 42% - not teaching it
LI, LINFENG reviews ↗ 3.30 3.35 120 2 48% - not teaching it
CONLEY, WILLIAM JOSEPH reviews ↗ 2.84 2.82 117 3 32% - not teaching it
WU, JEREMY SHEUNG HIM reviews ↗ 2.71 2.67 114 3 28% - not teaching it
ARANT, TYLER JAMES reviews ↗ 3.27 3.32 108 3 51% average not teaching it
CHAPOUTO, ANDREIA reviews ↗ 2.84 2.82 103 2 37% - not teaching it
BADREDDINE, RANA reviews ↗ 3.15 3.18 96 3 48% very light not teaching it
MENZ, GEORG reviews ↗ 3.16 3.20 86 1 38% - not teaching it
BLASIUS, DON M reviews ↗ 3.11 3.14 82 2 38% - not teaching it
FORLANO, JUSTIN AMEDEO reviews ↗ 2.76 2.71 67 1 31% - not teaching it
SCAVIA, FEDERICO reviews ↗ 2.93 2.91 54 1 44% - not teaching it
JUNG, CONNIE reviews ↗ 2.64 2.53 51 1 25% - not teaching it
SUZUKI, FUMIAKI reviews ↗ 3.36 3.50 46 1 65% - not teaching it
TAN, HUI reviews ↗ 2.85 2.81 40 1 43% - not teaching it
VARVAREZOS, KONSTANTINOS KONTOGEORGAKIS reviews ↗ 3.23 3.35 39 1 54% - not teaching it
MARSDEN, KATIE reviews ↗ 2.81 2.75 37 1 32% - not teaching it
VISAN, MONICA reviews ↗ 3.07 3.12 37 1 43% - not teaching it
MUNOZ, SEBASTIAN reviews ↗ 2.63 2.47 36 1 36% - not teaching it
HAQUE, SAIKATUL reviews ↗ 2.86 2.82 35 1 29% - not teaching it
SONTHALIA, RISHI SAURABH reviews ↗ 3.13 3.23 31 1 45% - not teaching it
MUTLU AKATURK, HATICE reviews ↗ 3.05 3.11 28 1 54% - not teaching it
ALTAF, IQRA reviews ↗ 2.88 2.83 27 1 41% - not teaching it
PALMER, AARON Z reviews ↗ 3.10 3.19 27 1 33% - not teaching it
NEEMAN, ITAY reviews ↗ 2.78 2.67 27 1 30% - not teaching it
NURBEKYAN, LEVON reviews ↗ 3.11 3.23 22 1 36% - not teaching it
ROUQUIER, RAPHAEL ALEXIS reviews ↗ 2.80 2.67 20 1 25% - not teaching it
HU, NICHOLAS reviews ↗ 1.98 1.01 17 · small sample 1 6% - not teaching it

“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.

dibs measures outcomes: grades, seats, how fast a class fills. For what a class is like to sit in, BruinWalk has the reviews.

Reviews for MATH 131A

What comes first

The chain dibs can see is 4 courses long before MATH 131A. dibs has read a class page for every course in it.

Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.

In Falls

Ran in 5 of the last 5 Falls.

From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.

From the registrar's catalog

dibs has not read the registrar's description for this course. It reads them for general education courses only, so this says nothing about the course. Any section below links out to the registrar, where the catalog text is, and that text is also where a prerequisite the structured list does not carry would be written.

Sections in Fall 2026

You enroll in the discussion, not the lecture, so a discussion's status is the one that decides whether you get in. A lecture can read open while every discussion under it is full.

Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 5 readings. The registrar publishes hourly and dibs reads what it can each hour, so a row can be older than that.

Final enrollment, averaged across each term's sections: between 32 and 40 a term over 13 terms, summer excluded, most recently 36 in Fall 2025. That is the shape across years, not this term, which is above.

Seats over time in Fall 2026

How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it.

Lec 1 · Xu, P. · 160 of 160 enrolled

Same seat count, but the status moved and came back and the seat count moved and came back over 15 days

161158
17 Aug 15:07capacity 1602 Sep 02:42