MATH 164
Optimization
Lecture.
Fall 2025: 3 sections. 1 section is open. The oldest of these readings was about 1 month ago.
Grades
3.16
Average grade awarded in MATH 164. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
51%
of the 1,299 letter grades
D, F or W
8.3%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
1%
8 of 9 students passed
The registrar's own records: 1,299 grades over 16 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
4 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 16 terms ran 2.75 to 3.79.
Historical grades for KOVACOVA, GABRIELA, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 2 · 0.6%
- A 49 · 15.7%
- A- 33 · 10.6%
- B+ 33 · 10.6%
- B 47 · 15.1%
- B- 35 · 11.2%
- C+ 20 · 6.4%
- C 30 · 9.6%
- C- 24 · 7.7%
- D+ 6 · 1.9%
- D 13 · 4.2%
- D- 12 · 3.8%
- F 8 · 2.6%
- P 2 of 315
- I 1 of 315
Percentages are of the 312 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P) and incompletes (I).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Fall 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOVACOVA, GABRIELA reviews ↗ | 2.74 | 2.71 | 312 | 5 | 27% | average | Open, 1 seat left |
| ENAKOUTSA, KOFFI reviews ↗ | 3.34 | 3.35 | 214 | 4 | 67% | average | not teaching it |
| MENG, TINGWEI reviews ↗ | 3.18 | 3.18 | 193 | 4 | 54% | average | not teaching it |
| DIEPEVEEN, WILLEM reviews ↗ | 2.82 | 2.75 | 84 | 2 | 32% | - | not teaching it |
| ZHOU, MO reviews ↗ | 3.36 | 3.40 | 83 | 1 | 58% | - | Closed |
| LI, SHUANG reviews ↗ | 3.68 | 3.80 | 78 | 1 | 87% | - | not teaching it |
| GLEIZER, OLEG reviews ↗ | 3.46 | 3.54 | 70 | 2 | 70% | - | not teaching it |
| KASSAB, LARA reviews ↗ | 2.93 | 2.88 | 70 | 2 | 36% | light | not teaching it |
| SONTHALIA, RISHI SAURABH reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.68 | 62 | 2 | 68% | - | not teaching it |
| LI, MINCHEN reviews ↗ | 3.47 | 3.59 | 45 | 1 | 64% | - | not teaching it |
| MONTUFAR CUARTAS, GUIDO FRANCISCO reviews ↗ | 2.79 | 2.61 | 35 | 1 | 17% | - | not teaching it |
| RYU, ERNEST KANG reviews ↗ | 3.50 | 3.69 | 31 | 1 | 84% | - | not teaching it |
| GURDOGAN, HUBEYB USAME reviews ↗ | 3.19 | 3.21 | 22 | 1 | 45% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
What the work looks like
- Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 14 reviewers
- Quizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 2 reviewers
- Problem sets mentioned, no number given, said by 15 reviewers
- Group works mentioned, no number given, said by 1 reviewer
Read from 82 reviews 26 days ago. dibs counts only what a review actually states, so a kind of work nobody mentioned is absent rather than zero.
What comes first
The chain dibs can see is 5 courses long before MATH 164. Read from Fall 2026, because dibs has not read a class page for MATH 164 in Fall 2025 and a department can change what it requires. This is a floor, not a deadline: dibs has not read a class page for MATH 3B, so the real chain can only be longer than this, never shorter.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
In Falls
Ran in 5 of the last 5 Falls.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Enforced requisites: courses 115A, 131A. Not open for credit to students with credit for former Electrical Engineering 136. Fundamentals of optimization. Linear programming: basic solutions, simplex method, duality theory. Unconstrained optimization, Newton method for minimization. Nonlinear programming, optimality conditions for constrained problems. Additional topics from linear and nonlinear programming. P/NP or letter grading.
Sections in Fall 2025
Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 3 readings. That term is over, so nothing has moved since.
-
Lec 1 MWF 11:00am-11:50amClosed3.36predicted, this instructor · 83 grades
40 of 40 · 1 over enrolled -
not checked yet -
Lec 2 MWF 12:00pm-12:50pmOpen2.74predicted, this instructor · 312 grades
1 seat left. 39 of 40 enrolled -
not checked yet -
Lec 3 MWF 3:00pm-3:50pmClosed3.36predicted, this instructor · 83 grades
40 of 40 · 2 over enrolled -
not checked yet
Final enrollment, averaged across each term's sections: between 32 and 65 a term over 12 terms, summer excluded, most recently 42 in Fall 2025. That is the shape across years, not this term, which is above.
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking MATH 164 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.
Seats over time in Fall 2025
How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it. This course runs 3 lectures; the legend under the chart picks one.
A dot is a reading where something moved: the seat count, the status, or the waitlist.
What a flat run means, and where a line starts
Flat between dots means it did not drift, it held and then jumped, and a line starts when dibs first saw that lecture rather than reaching back before it existed. A lecture that has never moved draws a flat line across the whole window, and one with two or three readings draws a line joining them, which is too few to read a trend from.
Lec 1 · Zhou, M. · 40 of 40 · 1 over enrolled
Unchanged over 3 minutes
Both readings say 40 of 40.
Lec 2 · Kovacova, G. · 39 of 40 enrolled
Unchanged over 3 minutes
Both readings say 39 of 40.
Lec 3 · Zhou, M. · 40 of 40 · 2 over enrolled
Unchanged over 3 minutes
Both readings say 40 of 40.
How readings and alerts work
A reading and an hourly record are different things, and most charts here hold more of the second missing than present. dibs has taken readings of a section since long before it began keeping an hour-by-hour log of when it looked, so the empty stretches are dibs saying it was not keeping that log yet, not that it looked and found nothing. That is the age of the record and not a fault.
Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.
The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.