RES PRC 106
Scientific Leadership and Ethics
Grades
Pass/no pass only, so there is no average to report.
Graded P/NP: 21 records over 1 term.
In the A range
-
no letter grades in the record to count
D, F or W
-
no letter grades in the record to count
Taken pass/no pass
100%
100% of those passed
The registrar's own records: Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
No summer session is in that record.
The table below splits them.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- P 21 of 21
Counts are out of 21 recorded outcomes. These are non-letter grades and do not have a GPA.
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Fall 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FISHER, TIMOTHY S reviews ↗ | P/NP | 21 P/NP | 1 | - | - | not teaching it | |
| GRAY, DAVID HARRISON reviews ↗ | P/NP | 21 P/NP | 1 | - | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for RES PRC 106 in any term it holds, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
From the registrar's catalog
Seminar, two hours. Limited to undergraduates in UC LEADS or Clare Boothe Luce Scholars Programs. Individuals involved in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research are promoted throughout their careers due to their technical and scientific acumen. Many researchers attain leadership positions including running their laboratories, heading engineering departments, or working on research projects in which they are responsible for guiding students. The widely held system of training and promotion in the STEM fields does not provide researchers with skills the vast majority of employers feel are necessary for success in leadership endeavors. Researchers that do not find themselves in a managerial position need these social and organizational skills while working for principal investigators and research leaders. Provides instruction on these essential skills for STEM researchers through role-play, reflective journaling, problem-solving, and case studies. These principles are paired with lessons on ethics in the laboratory, focusing on real-world examples that may be faced by scientists and leaders. P/NP grading.
Sections in Fall 2025
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking RES PRC 106 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.