MCD BIO 60
Biomedical Ethics
Grades
3.87
Average grade awarded in MCD BIO 60. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
91%
of the 1,321 letter grades
D, F or W
0.2%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
3%
100% of those passed
The registrar's own records: 1,321 grades over 12 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
3 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 12 terms ran 3.68 to 4.00.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 137 · 10.4%
- A 831 · 62.9%
- A- 230 · 17.4%
- B+ 87 · 6.6%
- B 22 · 1.7%
- B- 9 · 0.7%
- C+ 1 · 0.1%
- C 1 · 0.1%
- C- 2 · 0.2%
- D+ 1 · 0.1%
- P 43 of 1,372
- I 7 of 1,372
- DR 1 of 1,372
Percentages are of the 1,321 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P), incompletes (I), and withdrawals (DR).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
Withdrawals are the exception to "excluded": DR is not scored, but it IS counted in the D, F or W figure above, which is reported over the letter grades plus the withdrawals. Pass/no pass and S/U outcomes are outside that figure on both sides.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Fall 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TULIPANA, PAUL ANDREW reviews ↗ | 3.90 | 3.90 | 906 | 8 | 95% | very light | not teaching it |
| GALLAGHER, KATIE JANE reviews ↗ | 3.72 | 3.71 | 299 | 3 | 74% | light | not teaching it |
| GOLDSTEIN, ANDREW reviews ↗ | 3.98 | 4.00 | 116 | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has read this course’s reviews and none of them say what kind of work it sets, so dibs has nothing to show rather than a guess. Read from 76 reviews about 1 month ago. That is the reviewers being silent, and not a course that sets no work.
In Falls
Ran in 4 of the last 5 Falls.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Examination of importance of ethics in research and exploration of how and why bioethics is relevant to reproductive screening, policy formation, public regulation, and law. Provides foundation in traditional ethics, consideration of subcategories of bioethics, neuroethics, and eugenics, and how to apply ethics to contemporary issues in research and technology. P/NP or letter grading.
Sections in Fall 2025
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking MCD BIO 60 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.