NURSING 269
Quality Improvement and Population-Based Quality of Practice
Grades
3.88
Average grade awarded in NURSING 269. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
94%
of the 339 letter grades
D, F or W
0.0%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 339 grades over 5 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
No summer session is in that record.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 5 terms ran 3.81 to 3.96.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 97 · 28.6%
- A 159 · 46.9%
- A- 64 · 18.9%
- B+ 7 · 2.1%
- B 5 · 1.5%
- B- 3 · 0.9%
- C+ 2 · 0.6%
- C 2 · 0.6%
Percentages are of the 339 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes.
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session A 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUENCA, EMMA LYN M reviews ↗ | 3.88 | 3.88 | 339 | 5 | 94% | - | not teaching it |
| ATIENZA, EUNICE UYTINGBAN reviews ↗ | 3.87 | 3.86 | 70 | 1 | 96% | - | not teaching it |
| HOLLOWAY, IAN W reviews ↗ | 3.89 | 3.90 | 67 | 1 | 96% | - | not teaching it |
| ROCES, BARBARA reviews ↗ | 3.94 | 3.96 | 67 | 1 | 99% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, four hours. Focus on principal elements related to quality improvement theories and ways in which quality management impacts the delivery of patient-centered and value-driven care. Discussion of concepts including improving system performance, efficient use of fiscal resources, quality improvement, and patient population quality practice at the organizational level. Review of methods to improve patient care outcomes, e.g., organizational support, effective teamwork, and quality improvement. Emphasis on quality management, patient safety, mitigating risk of adverse outcomes, evidence-based practice, cost-effective decision-making, resource management, and external impacts on quality control. Letter grading.
Sections in Summer Session A 2026
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking NURSING 269 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.