CH ENGR 106
Chemical Reaction Engineering
Grades
3.40
Average grade awarded in CH ENGR 106. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
57%
of the 270 letter grades
D, F or W
2.6%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 270 grades over 5 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
No summer session is in that record.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 5 terms ran 3.24 to 3.65.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 16 · 5.9%
- A 77 · 28.5%
- A- 61 · 22.6%
- B+ 39 · 14.4%
- B 32 · 11.9%
- B- 17 · 6.3%
- C+ 10 · 3.7%
- C 10 · 3.7%
- C- 1 · 0.4%
- D+ 2 · 0.7%
- D 2 · 0.7%
- D- 2 · 0.7%
- F 1 · 0.4%
Percentages are of the 270 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes.
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session A 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PETERSON, JOSEPH DANIEL reviews ↗ | 3.45 | 3.45 | 211 | 4 | 61% | very light | not teaching it |
| LU, YUNFENG reviews ↗ | 3.28 | 3.24 | 59 | 1 | 44% | heavy | not teaching it |
| CHAVEZ, STEVEN reviews ↗ | 3.34 | 3.32 | 56 | 1 | 55% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
What comes first
The chain dibs can see is 5 courses long before CH ENGR 106. Read from Fall 2026, because dibs has not read a class page for CH ENGR 106 in Summer Session A 2026 and a department can change what it requires. This is a floor, not a deadline: dibs has not read a class page for CH ENGR 101C, CH ENGR 102B, and CHEM 20B, so the real chain can only be longer than this, never shorter.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, four hours; discussion, one hour; outside study, seven hours. Enforced requisites: courses 100, 101C, 102B. Fundamentals of chemical kinetics and catalysis. Introduction to analysis and design of homogeneous and heterogeneous chemical reactors. Letter grading.
Sections in Summer Session A 2026
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking CH ENGR 106 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.