MATH 167
Mathematical Game Theory
Grades
3.26
Average grade awarded in MATH 167. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
52%
of the 300 letter grades
D, F or W
3.3%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
3%
10 of 10 students passed
The registrar's own records: 300 grades over 9 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
3 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 9 terms ran 2.87 to 3.74.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 45 · 15.0%
- A 78 · 26.0%
- A- 32 · 10.7%
- B+ 33 · 11.0%
- B 33 · 11.0%
- B- 17 · 5.7%
- C+ 21 · 7.0%
- C 19 · 6.3%
- C- 12 · 4.0%
- D+ 4 · 1.3%
- D 2 · 0.7%
- F 4 · 1.3%
- P 10 of 310
Percentages are of the 300 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session C 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLEIZER, OLEG reviews ↗ | 3.31 | 3.31 | 148 | 4 | 55% | very light | not teaching it |
| VOSS, MORITZ reviews ↗ | 3.21 | 3.20 | 62 | 2 | 50% | - | not teaching it |
| NURBEKYAN, LEVON reviews ↗ | 3.52 | 3.65 | 33 | 1 | 73% | - | not teaching it |
| ARANT, TYLER JAMES reviews ↗ | 3.01 | 2.88 | 32 | 1 | 38% | - | not teaching it |
| MENZ, GEORG reviews ↗ | 3.15 | 3.07 | 25 | 1 | 28% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
What the work looks like
- Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 10 reviewers
- Problem sets mentioned, no number given, said by 4 reviewers
- Projects mentioned, no number given, said by 1 reviewer
Read from 14 reviews 26 days ago. dibs counts only what a review actually states, so a kind of work nobody mentioned is absent rather than zero.
What comes first
The chain dibs can see is 5 courses long before MATH 167. Read from Fall 2026, because dibs has not read a class page for MATH 167 in Summer Session C 2026 and a department can change what it requires. This is a floor, not a deadline: dibs has not read a class page for MATH 3B, so the real chain can only be longer than this, never shorter.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Requisite: course 115A. Quantitative modeling of strategic interaction. Topics include extensive and normal form games, background probability, lotteries, mixed strategies, pure and mixed Nash equilibria and refinements, bargaining; emphasis on economic examples. Optional topics include repeated games and evolutionary game theory. P/NP or letter grading.
Sections in Summer Session C 2026
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking MATH 167 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.