Skip to content
dibs
You are looking at Winter 2026. That term is over, so these are last term's numbers rather than seats you can take. dibs holds 1,472 sections for Winter 2026, read about 1 month ago. Separately, it has finished 195 of the 3,572 courses on its current checking list for this term. Future-term coverage is incomplete, so a course with nothing here may simply not have been reached yet. Back to Fall 2026

COM SCI 180

Introduction to Algorithms and Complexity

4 units

Sections & times

Lecture and discussion.

Winter 2026: 1 lecture and 4 discussions. Nothing here is open. The oldest of these readings was about 1 month ago.

Grades

3.17

Average grade awarded in COM SCI 180. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.

In the A range

42%

of the 2,797 letter grades

D, F or W

2.5%

of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals

Taken pass/no pass

-

the registrar has this letter grade only this term

The registrar's own records: 2,797 grades over 14 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.

What is inside that record

1 of those terms is a summer session, and summer sessions are counted here.

The table below splits them, and term averages across those 14 terms ran 2.83 to 3.83.

Historical grades for OSTROVSKY, RAFAIL, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.

  • A+ 103 · 52.8%
  • A 47 · 24.1%
  • A- 17 · 8.7%
  • B+ 6 · 3.1%
  • B 18 · 9.2%
  • B- 2 · 1.0%
  • C 2 · 1.0%
  • I 1 of 196

Percentages are of the 195 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: incompletes (I).

How the non-letter outcomes are counted

They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.

By instructor

Predicted GPA, raw average, sample size, terms, A range and the workload reviewers reported for every instructor with a grade record in this course
Instructor Predicted GPA Raw n Terms A range Workload Winter 2026
SARRAFZADEH, MAJID reviews ↗ 3.02 3.02 1,412 7 33% heavy not teaching it
HSIEH, CHO-JUI reviews ↗ 3.28 3.28 544 2 47% average not teaching it
BATISTA, SANDRA reviews ↗ 3.24 3.25 387 2 42% average not teaching it
REINMAN, GLENN D reviews ↗ 3.13 3.13 234 1 43% - not teaching it
OSTROVSKY, RAFAIL reviews ↗ 3.77 3.83 195 1 86% average Waitlist, 0 of 30 places taken
GAFNI, ELIEZER M reviews ↗ 3.32 3.42 25 1 52% very heavy not teaching it
Why Predicted is not the Raw average

“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.

Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.

Reviews for COM SCI 180

Workload and assignments

Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.

What the work looks like

  • 1 exam, said by 16 reviewers
  • 10 quizzes, said by 4 reviewers
  • 6 problem sets, said by 15 reviewers

Read from 120 reviews 16 days ago. dibs counts only what a review actually states, so a kind of work nobody mentioned is absent rather than zero.

Read the source reviews

What comes first

The chain dibs can see is 4 courses long before COM SCI 180. Read from Fall 2026, because dibs has not read a class page for COM SCI 180 in Winter 2026 and a department can change what it requires. dibs has read a class page for every course in it.

Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.

In Winters

Ran in 4 of the last 4 Winters.

From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.

From the registrar's catalog

Lecture, four hours; discussion, two hours; outside study, six hours. Enforced requisites: course 32, Mathematics 61. Designed for junior/senior Computer Science majors. Introduction to design and analysis of algorithms. Design techniques: divide-and-conquer, greedy method, dynamic programming; selection of prototypical algorithms; choice of data structures and representations; complexity measures: time, space, upper, lower bounds, asymptotic complexity; NP-completeness. Letter grading.

Sections in Winter 2026

You enroll in the discussion, not the lecture, so a discussion's status is the one that decides whether you get in. A lecture can read open while every discussion under it is full.

Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 5 readings. That term is over, so nothing has moved since.

Final enrollment, averaged across each term's sections: between 25 and 353 a term over 13 terms, summer excluded, most recently 173 in Fall 2025. That is the shape across years, not this term, which is above.

From the people who took it

Student reviews

What taking COM SCI 180 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.

Your experience could be the first.

No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.

Looking for more perspectives?

External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.

Read reviews on BruinWalk

Community guidelines

Seats over time in Winter 2026

How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it.

A dot is a reading where something moved: the seat count, the status, or the waitlist.

What a flat run means, and where a line starts

Flat between dots means it did not drift, it held and then jumped, and a line starts when dibs first saw that lecture rather than reaching back before it existed. A lecture that has never moved draws a flat line across the whole window, and one with two or three readings draws a line joining them, which is too few to read a trend from.

Lec 1 · Ostrovsky, R. · 240 of 240 · 6 over enrolled

Unchanged over 1 minute

240 of 240 · no seats left in its discussions

Both readings say 240 of 240.

27 Aug 03:0527 Aug 03:06
1 hour plotted. dibs read it.240 of 240 enrolled at the newest reading, about 1 month ago, and no seats left in its discussions. Seats from 27 Aug 03:05 to 27 Aug 03:06, 240 to 240. The line is flat across the whole window: recorded enrollment counts match. Changes between reads may be missed. Every hour plotted carries a read, so a count that did not move here was checked and did not move.
How readings and alerts work

A reading and an hourly record are different things, and most charts here hold more of the second missing than present. dibs has taken readings of a section since long before it began keeping an hour-by-hour log of when it looked, so the empty stretches are dibs saying it was not keeping that log yet, not that it looked and found nothing. That is the age of the record and not a fault.

Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.

The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.