LING 105
Morphology
Grades
3.62
Average grade awarded in LING 105. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
79%
of the 164 letter grades
D, F or W
4.9%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
3%
5 of 5 students passed
The registrar's own records: 164 grades over 5 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
No summer session is in that record.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 5 terms ran 3.25 to 3.86.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 69 · 42.1%
- A 38 · 23.2%
- A- 23 · 14.0%
- B+ 10 · 6.1%
- B 7 · 4.3%
- B- 6 · 3.7%
- C+ 3 · 1.8%
- D+ 1 · 0.6%
- D 2 · 1.2%
- F 5 · 3.0%
- P 5 of 169
Percentages are of the 164 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session C 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILVESTRI, GIUSEPPINA reviews ↗ | 3.74 | 3.76 | 110 | 3 | 90% | - | not teaching it |
| YUAN, MICHELLE reviews ↗ | 3.35 | 3.25 | 41 | 1 | 51% | - | not teaching it |
| OPERSTEIN, NATALIE reviews ↗ | 3.60 | 3.58 | 13 · | 1 | 77% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for LING 105 in any term it holds, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, four hours; discussion, one hour (when scheduled). Enforced requisite: course 20. In linguistics, morphology is study of word structure. Morphological theory seeks to answer questions such as how should words and their component parts (roots, prefixes, suffixes, vowel changes) be classified crosslinguistically? how do speakers store, produce, and process complex words (words with affixes, compounds)? how do speakers know how to produce correct word forms even when they have not previously heard them and how do speakers know that particular words are well-formed or ill-formed? is there principled distinction in traditional division between inflection and derivation? how can we best account for variation in forms that are same (e.g., root in keep/kept even though vowels are different)? can we formulate crosslinguistic generalizations about word structure? P/NP or letter grading.
Sections in Summer Session C 2026
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking LING 105 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.