ENGR 214
Management Communication
Grades
3.80
Average grade awarded in ENGR 214. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
82%
of the 497 letter grades
D, F or W
0.2%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 497 grades over 9 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
No summer session is in that record.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 9 terms ran 3.69 to 3.93.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 1 · 0.2%
- A 290 · 58.4%
- A- 119 · 23.9%
- B+ 82 · 16.5%
- B 4 · 0.8%
- F 1 · 0.2%
- I 1 of 498
Percentages are of the 497 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: incompletes (I).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Spring 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GERSHWIN, DAVID ANDREW reviews ↗ | 3.87 | 3.88 | 171 | 4 | 95% | - | not teaching it |
| LAO, JOSELITO reviews ↗ | 3.69 | 3.67 | 137 | 4 | 70% | - | not teaching it |
| MCCANN, ROBERT reviews ↗ | 3.88 | 3.89 | 114 | 3 | 89% | - | not teaching it |
| MCCANN, ROBERT M reviews ↗ | 3.84 | 3.85 | 68 | 2 | 82% | - | not teaching it |
| YANG, JENN-MING reviews ↗ | 3.72 | 3.69 | 51 | 1 | 73% | - | not teaching it |
| WERBER, STEVEN LEE reviews ↗ | 3.89 | 3.93 | 44 | 1 | 98% | - | not teaching it |
| YANG, CHENG-FU reviews ↗ | 3.66 | 3.60 | 41 | 1 | 54% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
In Springs
Has not run in Spring in the 4 Springs dibs holds records for, back to Fall 2021. That is 4 years of grade records rather than the course catalog, so it says what has happened and not what the department will do next.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, four hours. Exploration of knowledge, attributes, skills, and strategies necessary to succeed communicatively in workplace, with focus on business presentation skills, visual and verbal persuasion skills, and interpersonal communication skills. Letter grading.
Sections in Spring 2026
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking ENGR 214 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.