MATH 178C
Foundations of Actuarial Mathematics: Loss Models
Grades
2.91
Average grade awarded in MATH 178C. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
27%
of the 146 letter grades
D, F or W
2.7%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
0%
nobody in the record took it pass/no pass
The registrar's own records: 146 grades over 3 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
No summer session is in that record.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 3 terms ran 2.86 to 2.94.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 4 · 2.7%
- A 25 · 17.1%
- A- 10 · 6.8%
- B+ 20 · 13.7%
- B 19 · 13.0%
- B- 21 · 14.4%
- C+ 19 · 13.0%
- C 16 · 11.0%
- C- 8 · 5.5%
- D+ 1 · 0.7%
- D- 3 · 2.1%
Percentages are of the 146 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes.
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Winter 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOSS, MORITZ reviews ↗ | 2.91 | 2.90 | 91 | 2 | 27% | - | not teaching it |
| MENZ, GEORG reviews ↗ | 2.94 | 2.94 | 55 | 1 | 25% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for MATH 178C in any term it holds, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Requisite: course 178B. Study of loss models associated with actuarial problems. Covers severity, frequency, and aggregate loss models, parameter estimation (frequentist, Bayesian), model selection, and credibility. Letter grading.
Sections in Winter 2026
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking MATH 178C was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.