LING 1
Introduction to Study of Language
Grades
3.64
Average grade awarded in LING 1. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
75%
of the 7,645 letter grades
D, F or W
2.1%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
6%
96% of those passed
The registrar's own records: 7,645 grades over 17 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
4 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 17 terms ran 3.39 to 3.82.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 2,680 · 35.1%
- A 2,103 · 27.5%
- A- 958 · 12.5%
- B+ 624 · 8.2%
- B 510 · 6.7%
- B- 264 · 3.5%
- C+ 161 · 2.1%
- C 119 · 1.6%
- C- 70 · 0.9%
- D+ 35 · 0.5%
- D 37 · 0.5%
- D- 19 · 0.2%
- F 65 · 0.9%
- P 447 of 8,145
- NP 17 of 8,145
- I 35 of 8,145
- DR 1 of 8,145
Percentages are of the 7,645 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P), no-passes (NP), incompletes (I), and withdrawals (DR).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
Withdrawals are the exception to "excluded": DR is not scored, but it IS counted in the D, F or W figure above, which is reported over the letter grades plus the withdrawals. Pass/no pass and S/U outcomes are outside that figure on both sides.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session C 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILVESTRI, GIUSEPPINA reviews ↗ | 3.65 | 3.65 | 4,090 | 9 | 76% | very light | not teaching it |
| RETT, JESSICA L reviews ↗ | 3.65 | 3.65 | 1,036 | 3 | 77% | heavy | not teaching it |
| TORRENCE, WILLIAM HAROLD reviews ↗ | 3.45 | 3.45 | 898 | 2 | 63% | - | not teaching it |
| KEINE, STEFAN reviews ↗ | 3.71 | 3.71 | 511 | 1 | 80% | - | not teaching it |
| MOTTER, THOMAS CLARENCE reviews ↗ | 3.77 | 3.77 | 480 | 1 | 84% | very light | not teaching it |
| TORRENCE, WILLIAM HAROLD, JR reviews ↗ | 3.57 | 3.57 | 451 | 1 | 71% | - | not teaching it |
| FULLER, CORRINA reviews ↗ | 3.80 | 3.81 | 233 | 1 | 85% | - | not teaching it |
| AZIZ, JAKE reviews ↗ | 3.78 | 3.80 | 179 | 1 | 87% | average | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has read this course’s reviews and none of them say what kind of work it sets, so dibs has nothing to show rather than a guess. Read from 168 reviews about 1 month ago. That is the reviewers being silent, and not a course that sets no work.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Summary for general undergraduates of what is known about human language; biological basis of language, scientific study of language and human cognition; uniqueness of human language, its structure, universality, its diversity; language in social and cultural setting; language in relation to other aspects of human inquiry and knowledge. P/NP or letter grading.
Sections in Summer Session C 2026
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking LING 1 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.