MATH 151A
Applied Numerical Methods
Grades
3.53
Average grade awarded in MATH 151A. Not a rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
68%
of the 1,555 letter grades
D, F or W
2.6%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 1,555 grades over 13 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025, summer excluded. Every instructor is pooled here. The table below splits them, and term averages across those 13 terms ran 3.32 to 3.85.
- A+ 78 · 5.0%
- A 751 · 48.3%
- A- 222 · 14.3%
- B+ 153 · 9.8%
- B 140 · 9.0%
- B- 70 · 4.5%
- C+ 52 · 3.3%
- C 35 · 2.3%
- C- 15 · 1.0%
- D+ 6 · 0.4%
- D 10 · 0.6%
- D- 5 · 0.3%
- F 18 · 1.2%
- I 6 of 1,562
- DR 1 of 1,562
Percentages are of the 1,555 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: incompletes (I) and withdrawals (DR). They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication. Withdrawals are the exception to "excluded": DR is not scored, but it IS counted in the D, F or W figure above, which is reported over the letter grades plus the withdrawals. Pass/no pass and S/U outcomes are outside that figure on both sides.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session A 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEGRINI, ELISA reviews ↗ | 3.51 | 3.51 | 271 | 4 | 65% | - | not teaching it |
| ENAKOUTSA, KOFFI reviews ↗ | 3.62 | 3.63 | 205 | 3 | 74% | - | not teaching it |
| BLASIUS, DON M reviews ↗ | 3.70 | 3.72 | 163 | 3 | 83% | - | not teaching it |
| KASHEFI, ALI reviews ↗ | 3.32 | 3.30 | 145 | 3 | 54% | - | not teaching it |
| JIANG, CHENFANFU reviews ↗ | 3.83 | 3.88 | 107 | 2 | 91% | - | not teaching it |
| MAIMAITIYIMING, WUMAIER reviews ↗ | 3.77 | 3.82 | 84 | 1 | 89% | - | not teaching it |
| ZHOU, MO reviews ↗ | 3.43 | 3.41 | 80 | 1 | 59% | - | not teaching it |
| HAN, FUQUN reviews ↗ | 3.60 | 3.62 | 78 | 2 | 68% | - | not teaching it |
| TAN, HONG YE reviews ↗ | 3.16 | 3.07 | 70 | 1 | 44% | - | not teaching it |
| SCHAEFFER, HAYDEN KYLER reviews ↗ | 3.45 | 3.43 | 68 | 1 | 57% | - | not teaching it |
| ACEVES SANCHEZ, PEDRO reviews ↗ | 3.42 | 3.40 | 67 | 1 | 61% | light | not teaching it |
| BAKER, JUSTIN reviews ↗ | 3.55 | 3.55 | 42 | 1 | 57% | - | not teaching it |
| CARNEY, SEAN PATRICK reviews ↗ | 3.33 | 3.25 | 41 | 1 | 54% | average | not teaching it |
| LI, MINCHEN reviews ↗ | 3.66 | 3.73 | 36 | 1 | 81% | - | not teaching it |
| WONG, KA WAH reviews ↗ | 3.41 | 3.35 | 34 | 1 | 62% | - | not teaching it |
| ANDERSON, CHRISTOPHER R reviews ↗ | 3.30 | 3.18 | 34 | 1 | 44% | very light | not teaching it |
| DING, LINGYUN reviews ↗ | 3.41 | 3.35 | 30 | 1 | 57% | - | not teaching it |
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
dibs measures outcomes: grades, seats, how fast a class fills. For what a class is like to sit in, BruinWalk has the reviews.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for MATH 151A, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
From the registrar's catalog
dibs has not read the registrar's description for this course. It reads them for general education courses only, so this says nothing about the course. Any section below links out to the registrar, where the catalog text is, and that text is also where a prerequisite the structured list does not carry would be written.