MATH 151A
Applied Numerical Methods
Lecture and discussion. The registrar has published a final exam time.
Fall 2026: 2 lectures and 4 discussions. 1 lecture and 3 discussions are open. The oldest of these readings was 22 minutes ago.
Grades
3.53
Average grade awarded in MATH 151A. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
68%
of the 1,555 letter grades
D, F or W
2.6%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 1,555 grades over 13 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
2 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 13 terms ran 3.32 to 3.85.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 78 · 5.0%
- A 751 · 48.3%
- A- 222 · 14.3%
- B+ 153 · 9.8%
- B 140 · 9.0%
- B- 70 · 4.5%
- C+ 52 · 3.3%
- C 35 · 2.3%
- C- 15 · 1.0%
- D+ 6 · 0.4%
- D 10 · 0.6%
- D- 5 · 0.3%
- F 18 · 1.2%
- I 6 of 1,562
- DR 1 of 1,562
Percentages are of the 1,555 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: incompletes (I) and withdrawals (DR).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
Withdrawals are the exception to "excluded": DR is not scored, but it IS counted in the D, F or W figure above, which is reported over the letter grades plus the withdrawals. Pass/no pass and S/U outcomes are outside that figure on both sides.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Fall 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEGRINI, ELISA reviews ↗ | 3.51 | 3.51 | 271 | 4 | 65% | - | not teaching it |
| ENAKOUTSA, KOFFI reviews ↗ | 3.62 | 3.63 | 205 | 3 | 74% | very light | not teaching it |
| BLASIUS, DON M reviews ↗ | 3.70 | 3.72 | 163 | 3 | 83% | - | not teaching it |
| KASHEFI, ALI reviews ↗ | 3.32 | 3.30 | 145 | 3 | 54% | very light | not teaching it |
| JIANG, CHENFANFU reviews ↗ | 3.83 | 3.88 | 107 | 2 | 91% | - | not teaching it |
| MAIMAITIYIMING, WUMAIER reviews ↗ | 3.77 | 3.82 | 84 | 1 | 89% | light | not teaching it |
| ZHOU, MO reviews ↗ | 3.43 | 3.41 | 80 | 1 | 59% | - | not teaching it |
| HAN, FUQUN reviews ↗ | 3.60 | 3.62 | 78 | 2 | 68% | - | not teaching it |
| TAN, HONG YE reviews ↗ | 3.16 | 3.07 | 70 | 1 | 44% | - | not teaching it |
| SCHAEFFER, HAYDEN KYLER reviews ↗ | 3.45 | 3.43 | 68 | 1 | 57% | - | not teaching it |
| ACEVES SANCHEZ, PEDRO reviews ↗ | 3.42 | 3.40 | 67 | 1 | 61% | light | not teaching it |
| BAKER, JUSTIN reviews ↗ | 3.55 | 3.55 | 42 | 1 | 57% | - | not teaching it |
| CARNEY, SEAN PATRICK reviews ↗ | 3.33 | 3.25 | 41 | 1 | 54% | average | not teaching it |
| LI, MINCHEN reviews ↗ | 3.66 | 3.73 | 36 | 1 | 81% | light | not teaching it |
| WONG, KA WAH reviews ↗ | 3.41 | 3.35 | 34 | 1 | 62% | very light | not teaching it |
| ANDERSON, CHRISTOPHER R reviews ↗ | 3.30 | 3.18 | 34 | 1 | 44% | very light | not teaching it |
| DING, LINGYUN reviews ↗ | 3.41 | 3.35 | 30 | 1 | 57% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Reported assignments across instructors and terms. This term's syllabus may differ.
No assignment details are available in this review summary. Based on 86 reviews; source checked about 1 month ago. Missing details do not mean there are no papers or exams. Check the current syllabus.
What comes first
The chain dibs can see is 5 courses long before MATH 151A. This is a floor, not a deadline: dibs has not read a class page for MATH 3B, so the real chain can only be longer than this, never shorter.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
In Falls
Ran in 4 of the last 5 Falls.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Requisites: courses 32B, 33B, 115A, Program in Computing 10A or Computer Science 31. Introduction to numerical methods with emphasis on algorithms, analysis of algorithms, and computer implementation issues. Solution of nonlinear equations. Numerical differentiation, integration, and interpolation. Direct methods for solving linear systems. Letter grading.
Sections in Fall 2026
Choose an open discussion to enroll; an open lecture alone does not mean a seat is available.
Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 6 readings. Seat readings are snapshots, not live availability. Their timestamps show when dibs last checked.
-
Seats
Open17 seats left in discussions.
Lecture: 63 of 80 enrolled
Instructor
Sule, S.
3.53Predicted GPA
Historical records across all instructors; 1,555 letter gradesSeat risk
low risk -
Seats
ClosedLecture: 80 of 80 · 2 over enrolled
Instructor
Vural, Z.
3.53Predicted GPA
Historical records across all instructors; 1,555 letter gradesSeat risk
high risk2 discussions, 1 open: Dis 2B, R 10:00am-10:50am. Lecture reads closed, so its 1 open discussion cannot be reached from here. No waitlist listed.Every discussion, with its time and seats: 2 discussions
Final enrollment, averaged across each term's sections: between 36 and 81 a term over 11 terms, summer excluded, most recently 38 in Fall 2025. That is the shape across years, not this term, which is above.
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking MATH 151A was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.
Seats over time in Fall 2026
How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it. This course runs 2 lectures; the legend under the chart picks one.
A dot is a reading where something moved: the seat count, the status, or the waitlist.
What a flat run means, and where a line starts
Flat between dots means it did not drift, it held and then jumped, and a line starts when dibs first saw that lecture rather than reaching back before it existed. A lecture that has never moved draws a flat line across the whole window, and one with two or three readings draws a line joining them, which is too few to read a trend from.
Lec 1 · Sule, S. · 63 of 80 enrolled
Freed 17 seats over 2 months
Lec 2 · Vural, Z. · 80 of 80 · 2 over enrolled
Same seat count, but the status moved and came back and the waitlist moved and came back over 2 months
All 44 readings say 80 of 80.
How readings and alerts work
Dated seat counts can be available even when hourly check history is missing. Gaps do not show whether seats changed between observations.
Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.
The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.