MGMT 298E
Special Topics in Management
Grades
3.64
Average grade awarded in MGMT 298E. Not a rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
66%
of the 830 letter grades
D, F or W
0.1%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 830 grades over 11 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025, summer excluded. Every instructor is pooled here. The table below splits them, and term averages across those 11 terms ran 3.48 to 3.96.
- A+ 55 · 6.6%
- A 283 · 34.1%
- A- 208 · 25.1%
- B+ 188 · 22.7%
- B 82 · 9.9%
- B- 7 · 0.8%
- C+ 3 · 0.4%
- C 2 · 0.2%
- C- 1 · 0.1%
- F 1 · 0.1%
- I 1 of 831
Percentages are of the 830 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: incompletes (I). They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session A 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SORENSON, OLAV JOHANN reviews ↗ | 3.50 | 3.49 | 274 | 6 | 49% | - | not teaching it |
| ULLMEN, JOHN B reviews ↗ | 3.94 | 4.00 | 83 | 2 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| STERNBERG, JUSTIN LAURENCE reviews ↗ | 3.94 | 4.00 | 83 | 2 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| FARRELL, BRIAN J reviews ↗ | 3.64 | 3.64 | 67 | 3 | 64% | - | not teaching it |
| WELCH, IVO I reviews ↗ | 3.67 | 3.68 | 54 | 1 | 80% | - | not teaching it |
| SHIH, MARGARET JOAN reviews ↗ | 3.65 | 3.65 | 52 | 1 | 60% | - | not teaching it |
| KAUL, SURBHI reviews ↗ | 3.76 | 3.80 | 49 | 1 | 92% | - | not teaching it |
| GROSS, ANDREW DAVID reviews ↗ | 3.71 | 3.74 | 39 | 2 | 82% | - | not teaching it |
| NAJAFI, JAHM reviews ↗ | 3.60 | 3.58 | 38 | 1 | 50% | - | not teaching it |
| CARO, FELIPE reviews ↗ | 3.63 | 3.62 | 38 | 1 | 71% | - | not teaching it |
| SOOD, SANJAY reviews ↗ | 3.60 | 3.58 | 38 | 1 | 50% | - | not teaching it |
| MEHTA, KETAV HIMANSHU reviews ↗ | 3.54 | 3.49 | 29 | 1 | 55% | - | not teaching it |
| SIMMS, CODY reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.50 | 26 | 1 | 62% | - | not teaching it |
| COCHRAN, KATE reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.50 | 26 | 1 | 62% | - | not teaching it |
| LEE, JASON J S reviews ↗ | 3.81 | 3.94 | 24 | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| TAMMINEEDI, ANIL reviews ↗ | 3.81 | 3.94 | 24 | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| FAROOQ, HAMZA reviews ↗ | 3.53 | 3.44 | 23 | 1 | 39% | - | not teaching it |
| BENDERSKY, CORINNE B reviews ↗ | 3.57 | 3.51 | 18 · small sample | 1 | 44% | - | not teaching it |
| NORTHROP, GAYLE SCHECK reviews ↗ | 3.79 | 3.96 | 16 · small sample | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
dibs measures outcomes: grades, seats, how fast a class fills. For what a class is like to sit in, BruinWalk has the reviews.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for MGMT 298E, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
From the registrar's catalog
dibs has not read the registrar's description for this course. It reads them for general education courses only, so this says nothing about the course. Any section below links out to the registrar, where the catalog text is, and that text is also where a prerequisite the structured list does not carry would be written.