PHILOS 22
Introduction to Ethical Theory
Grades
3.75
Average grade awarded in PHILOS 22. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
82%
of the 1,353 letter grades
D, F or W
1.1%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
4%
96% of those passed
The registrar's own records: 1,353 grades over 9 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
4 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 9 terms ran 3.22 to 4.00.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 32 · 2.4%
- A 844 · 62.4%
- A- 227 · 16.8%
- B+ 123 · 9.1%
- B 69 · 5.1%
- B- 29 · 2.1%
- C+ 9 · 0.7%
- C 3 · 0.2%
- C- 2 · 0.1%
- D+ 3 · 0.2%
- D 1 · 0.1%
- F 11 · 0.8%
- P 50 of 1,423
- NP 2 of 1,423
- I 18 of 1,423
Percentages are of the 1,353 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P), no-passes (NP), and incompletes (I).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Winter 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JULIUS, ALEXANDER JACOB reviews ↗ | 3.94 | 3.95 | 796 | 3 | 98% | very light | not teaching it |
| DEWITT, JANELLE reviews ↗ | 3.55 | 3.54 | 236 | 1 | 61% | light | not teaching it |
| TULIPANA, PAUL ANDREW reviews ↗ | 3.26 | 3.22 | 198 | 1 | 42% | - | not teaching it |
| LAWRENCE, GAVIN reviews ↗ | 3.66 | 3.64 | 92 | 3 | 77% | heavy | not teaching it |
| RESCORLA, MICHAEL ARTHUR reviews ↗ | 3.84 | 3.89 | 31 | 1 | 94% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
What the work looks like
- 2 exams, said by 2 reviewers
- 3 quizzes, said by 2 reviewers
- 2 papers, said by 12 reviewers
Read from 90 reviews about 1 month ago. dibs counts only what a review actually states, so a kind of work nobody mentioned is absent rather than zero.
In Winters
Has not run in Winter in the 3 Winters dibs holds records for, back to Spring 2022. That is 3 years of grade records rather than the course catalog, so it says what has happened and not what the department will do next.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Not open for credit to students with credit for course 22W. Recommended or required for many upper-division courses in Group III. Systematic introduction to ethical theory, including discussion of egoism, utilitarianism, justice, responsibility, meaning of ethical terms, relativism, etc. P/NP or letter grading.
Sections in Winter 2027
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking PHILOS 22 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.