COM HLT 48
Nutrition and Food Studies: Principles and Practice
Grades
3.66
Average grade awarded in COM HLT 48. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
85%
of the 292 letter grades
D, F or W
4.8%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
6%
19 of 19 students passed
The registrar's own records: 292 grades over 4 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
Every one of those terms is a summer session, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 4 terms ran 3.38 to 3.90.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 71 · 24.3%
- A 132 · 45.2%
- A- 44 · 15.1%
- B+ 11 · 3.8%
- B 11 · 3.8%
- B- 3 · 1.0%
- C+ 3 · 1.0%
- C- 3 · 1.0%
- D+ 1 · 0.3%
- D 3 · 1.0%
- F 10 · 3.4%
- P 19 of 312
- I 1 of 312
Percentages are of the 292 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P) and incompletes (I).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Winter 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HERMAN, DENA R reviews ↗ | 3.71 | 3.71 | 199 | 4 | 87% | - | not teaching it |
| MUTH, NATALIE D reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.54 | 93 | 3 | 80% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
There are no BruinWalk reviews of this course on record as of 26 days ago, so nobody has told dibs what kind of work it sets. That is dibs holding no reviews at all, and not reviewers who wrote without mentioning the work.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for COM HLT 48 in any term it holds, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Overview of nutritional sciences and public health nutrition. Examination of basic science concepts of nutrition and application of them to student lives and real-world issues through lectures, videos, diet analysis, activities, reports, discussion of video and reading assignments, and reviews of community programs that apply nutrition and behavior theory to improve health of public. Students use observational research methods to create and answer questions about nutrition question in their cohort. P/NP or letter grading.
Sections in Winter 2027
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking COM HLT 48 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.