GENDER 101W
Writing Gender
Needs a grade of C or better: C- does not count, and neither does a Passed grade.
Grades
3.79
Average grade awarded in GENDER 101W. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
87%
of the 127 letter grades
D, F or W
1.6%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
0%
nobody in the record took it pass/no pass
The registrar's own records: 127 grades over 4 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
Every one of those terms is a summer session, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 4 terms ran 3.75 to 3.84.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 34 · 26.8%
- A 57 · 44.9%
- A- 20 · 15.7%
- B+ 5 · 3.9%
- B 7 · 5.5%
- C+ 1 · 0.8%
- C 1 · 0.8%
- D 1 · 0.8%
- F 1 · 0.8%
Percentages are of the 127 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes.
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session A 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARCHANT, ELIZABETH A reviews ↗ | 3.78 | 3.78 | 82 | 2 | 87% | - | not teaching it |
| OLDHAM, EBONY reviews ↗ | 3.82 | 3.84 | 38 | 2 | 89% | - | not teaching it |
| BAUTISTA, NIDIA MELISSA reviews ↗ | 3.78 | 3.77 | 36 | 2 | 86% | - | not teaching it |
| RAZACK, SHERENE HALIDA reviews ↗ | 3.80 | 3.81 | 19 · | 1 | 89% | - | not teaching it |
| GOMEZ, TALIA MARLYN reviews ↗ | 3.81 | 3.84 | 14 · | 1 | 93% | - | not teaching it |
| HAN, JU HUI JUDY reviews ↗ | 3.77 | 3.75 | 12 · | 1 | 83% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
What comes first
dibs has not read a class page for GENDER 101W in any term it holds, so it cannot say what comes before it.
Counted in courses rather than quarters: dibs does not know which of them a department lets you take together.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours. Requisite: English Composition 3. Development of critical reading and writing skills necessary for academic success. Students engage assigned readings in conversation with week's leading question. Generation and continuous development of paper topic as result of in-class discussions and formal writing exercises. Small writing groups assist students in understanding relationship between how written thoughts are presented and how they are comprehended by different readers. Students gain understanding of writing process, including topic conceptualization, objective of writing project, organization of thoughts and resources, selection of objects of study, personal writing style, etc. Satisfies Writing II requirement. Letter grading.
Sections in Summer Session A 2026
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking GENDER 101W was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.