EDUC 35
Introduction to Inquiry and Research in Education
Lecture.
Summer Session A 2026: 1 section. It is open. The oldest of these readings was about 2 months ago.
Grades
3.54
Average grade awarded in EDUC 35. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
68%
of the 876 letter grades
D, F or W
1.5%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 876 grades over 13 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
1 of those terms is a summer session, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 13 terms ran 3.40 to 3.73.
Historical grades for HO, ERIC MING-YIN, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
No grade history is available for this professor in this course.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session A 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAGAN, KEVIN reviews ↗ | 3.57 | 3.57 | 345 | 5 | 71% | very light | not teaching it |
| MARTINEZ-FERNANDEZ, JOSE-FELIPE reviews ↗ | 3.52 | 3.52 | 338 | 4 | 62% | average | not teaching it |
| TOBIASON, GLORY AMANDA reviews ↗ | 3.51 | 3.51 | 176 | 3 | 69% | light | not teaching it |
| SETOGUCHI, ERIC HIROYUKI reviews ↗ | 3.59 | 3.63 | 17 · | 1 | 82% | average | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Reported assignments across instructors and terms. This term's syllabus may differ.
What the work looks like
- No exams, 5 mentions in past reviews
- 2 quizzes, 6 mentions in past reviews
- Problem sets mentioned, no number given, 6 mentions in past reviews
- Projects mentioned, no number given, 1 mention in past reviews
- Group works mentioned, no number given, 4 mentions in past reviews
- Labs mentioned, no number given, 1 mention in past reviews
Based on 60 reviews; source checked about 2 months ago. dibs counts only what a review actually states, so a kind of work nobody mentioned is absent rather than zero.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, two hours; discussion, two hours. Introduction to empirical and analytical educational research. Intended for undergraduates interested in learning how to find, interpret, and evaluate research that investigates important questions around education and education systems. Overview of multiple methods of conceptualizing inquiry and gathering evidence, including qualitative (e.g., ethnographic, semi-structured interviews, case study), quantitative (e.g., surveys, experimental, descriptive), and mixed methods approaches. Introduction to software processing and analysis of data. Highlights ethics of conducting research in social sciences, and norms of conducting and reporting research in the field of education. Letter grading.
Sections in Summer Session A 2026
Seat counts as of . That term is over, so nothing has moved since.
-
Seats
Open8 seats left.
32 of 40 enrolled
Instructor
Ho, E.M. and Ross Olivares, J.
3.54Predicted GPA
Historical records across all instructors; 876 letter gradesSeat risk
-
Final enrollment, averaged across each term's sections: between 35 and 114 a term over 12 terms, summer excluded, most recently 114 in Fall 2025. That is the shape across years, not this term, which is above.
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking EDUC 35 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.
Seats over time in Summer Session A 2026
How each lecture has filled since dibs first saw it.
A dot is a reading where something moved: the seat count, the status, or the waitlist.
What a flat run means, and where a line starts
Flat between dots means it did not drift, it held and then jumped, and a line starts when dibs first saw that lecture rather than reaching back before it existed. A lecture that has never moved draws a flat line across the whole window, and one with two or three readings draws a line joining them, which is too few to read a trend from.
Lec 1 · Ho, E.M. and Ross Olivares, J. · 32 of 40 enrolled
Unchanged over 3 minutes
Both readings say 32 of 40.
How readings and alerts work
Dated seat counts can be available even when hourly check history is missing. Gaps do not show whether seats changed between observations.
Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.
The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.