3.72 average, all instructors · 26 grades · 2 terms
73 in 100 got an A minus or better · 0 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 18 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, all open.
Also listed as MUSCLG M82: the same class.
You cannot enroll in sections held for new students unless you are one, and they are marked in the list. Useful for seeing what a category really offers.
Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 37 readings. 1 of these readings is more than a day old and the other 36 were read in the last day, so this date belongs to that row rather than to the page. The registrar publishes hourly and dibs reads what it can each hour, so a row can be older than that.
3.72 average, all instructors · 26 grades · 2 terms
73 in 100 got an A minus or better · 0 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 18 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, all open.
Also listed as MUSCLG M82: the same class.
3.95 average, this instructor · 724 grades · 3 terms
97 in 100 got an A minus or better · Fewer than 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 26 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 14 discussions, all open.
1 exam, said by 11 reviewers1 paper, said by 8 reviewers
3.11 average, this instructor · 117 grades · 3 terms
39 in 100 got an A minus or better · 8 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 21 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, all open.
Also listed as AF AMER M116A and GJ STDS M110A: the same class.
3.90 average, this instructor · 775 grades · 5 terms
94 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 15 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, 7 open.
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 4 reviewers
3.87 average, all instructors · 2,611 grades · 8 terms
92 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 39 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 23 discussions, 8 open.
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 8 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
3.85 average, this instructor · 50 grades · 4 terms
86 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 4 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 2 discussions, 1 open: Dis 1B, F 3:00pm-3:50pm.
Also listed as MUSCLG M112: the same class.
3.83 average, this instructor · 534 grades · 3 terms
90 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 148 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, all open.
2 exams, said by 4 reviewers1 paper, said by 3 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
Also listed as GJ STDS M50A: the same class.
3.79 average, this instructor · 359 grades · 2 terms
86 in 100 got an A minus or better · Fewer than 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 48 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, 6 open.
Papers mentioned, no number given, said by 2 reviewers
3.76 average, all instructors · 65 grades · 2 terms
82 in 100 got an A minus or better · 0 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 10 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, all open.
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 4 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 3 reviewers
Also listed as JEWISH M82: the same class.
3.24 average, this instructor · 36 grades · 3 terms
33 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 6 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, all open.
Also listed as AF AMER M116A and ETHNMUS M110A: the same class.
3.94 average, this instructor · 108 grades · 3 terms
96 in 100 got an A minus or better · 0 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 25 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 2 discussions, all open. high risk
5 papers, said by 4 reviewers
Also listed as FOOD ST M79: the same class.
3.93 average, this instructor · 1,560 grades · 4 terms
96 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 25 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 14 discussions, all open. high risk
1 exam, said by 4 reviewers1 paper, said by 9 reviewers
3.87 average, this instructor · 730 grades · 3 terms
92 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 7 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 15 discussions, 7 open. high risk
1 exam, said by 4 reviewers2 papers, said by 14 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 2 reviewers
3.82 average, this instructor · 903 grades · 5 terms
89 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 52 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 9 discussions, 6 open. high risk
2 exams, said by 8 reviewers3 papers, said by 11 reviewers
3.81 average, this instructor · 353 grades · 3 terms
85 in 100 got an A minus or better · 0 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 5 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, all open. high risk
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 7 reviewers2 papers, said by 7 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 6 reviewers
3.81 average, this instructor · 327 grades · 5 terms
88 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 4 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 3 discussions, 2 open: Dis 1A, F 12:00pm-12:50pm, and Dis 1B, T 5:00pm-5:50pm. high risk
1 exam, said by 4 reviewersNo quizzes, said by 2 reviewers
3.79 average, all instructors · 3,564 grades · 14 terms
88 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 4 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 10 discussions, 1 open: Dis 1A, R 9:00am-9:50am. high risk
3.70 average, this instructor · 564 grades · 4 terms
83 in 100 got an A minus or better · 3 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 8 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 6 discussions, all open. high risk
3.68 average, this instructor · 763 grades · 3 terms
77 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 23 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 12 discussions, 11 open. high risk
1 exam, said by 3 reviewers2 papers, said by 6 reviewers
3.92 average, all instructors · 114 grades · 3 terms
96 in 100 got an A minus or better · 0 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed by the department. Seats counted across its open discussions. 8 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
Also listed as ETHNMUS M25: the same class.
3.51 average, this instructor · 482 grades · 3 terms
72 in 100 got an A minus or better · 4 in 100 took a D, F or W
Open, 10 seats left. Seats counted across its open discussions. 15 discussions, 10 open. high risk
2 exams, said by 7 reviewers2 papers, said by 4 reviewers5 quizzes, said by 6 reviewers
3.63 average, this instructor · 20 grades · 1 term
75 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Waitlist, 5 of 15 places taken. Seats counted across its open discussions. 3 discussions, none open. The way in is the lecture's waitlist, at 5 of 15.
3.61 average, this instructor · 386 grades · 3 terms
70 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Waitlist, 7 of 12 places taken. Seats counted across its open discussions. 6 discussions, none open. The way in is the lecture's waitlist, at 7 of 12.
2 exams, said by 9 reviewers2 papers, said by 7 reviewers
3.91 average, this instructor · 35 grades · 2 terms
97 in 100 got an A minus or better · 0 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 2 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
1 paper, said by 6 reviewers
Also listed as WL ARTS M79: the same class.
3.90 average, this instructor · 435 grades · 8 terms
95 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed.
3.89 average, this instructor · 41 grades · 2 terms
98 in 100 got an A minus or better · 0 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed.
3.88 average, this instructor · 581 grades · 3 terms
93 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 8 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
2 papers, said by 7 reviewers2 quizzes, said by 4 reviewers
Also listed as GJ STDS M25: the same class.
3.88 average, this instructor · 908 grades · 4 terms
93 in 100 got an A minus or better · 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed.
2 papers, said by 5 reviewers3 quizzes, said by 4 reviewers
3.84 average, this instructor · 72 grades · 3 terms
89 in 100 got an A minus or better · 0 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed.
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 2 reviewers1 paper, said by 4 reviewers
Also listed as CCAS M103D: the same class.
3.81 average, this instructor · 123 grades · 4 terms
90 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
3.81 average, this instructor · 99 grades · 3 terms
86 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 11 discussions, 5 open. Lecture reads closed, so its 5 open discussions cannot be reached from here. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
Also listed as ETHNMUS M50A: the same class.
3.78 average, this instructor · 1,466 grades · 5 terms
84 in 100 got an A minus or better · Fewer than 1 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 12 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 9 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 7 reviewers
3.73 average, this instructor · 880 grades · 4 terms
84 in 100 got an A minus or better · 2 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 8 discussions, none open.
Exams mentioned, no number given, said by 11 reviewersPapers mentioned, no number given, said by 10 reviewersQuizzes mentioned, no number given, said by 9 reviewers
3.70 average, this instructor · 98 grades · 4 terms
87 in 100 got an A minus or better · 5 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed.
Also listed as THEATER M103D: the same class.
3.58 average, this instructor · 468 grades · 2 terms
75 in 100 got an A minus or better · 4 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 12 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
1 exam, said by 12 reviewers3 papers, said by 6 reviewers
3.51 average, this instructor · 54 grades · 4 terms
76 in 100 got an A minus or better · 7 in 100 took a D, F or W
Closed. Seats counted across its open discussions. 2 discussions, none open. There is no waitlist either, so the only way in is somebody dropping the lecture.
Also listed as DIS STD M112: the same class.
2.83 average, this instructor · 37 grades · 3 terms
27 in 100 got an A minus or better · 13 in 100 took a D, F or W
Waitlist, 0 of 2 places taken. Seats counted across its open discussions. 4 discussions, none open. The way in is the lecture's waitlist, at 0 of 2.
Also listed as ETHNMUS M110A and GJ STDS M110A: the same class.
Where a course has discussions, the discussion is what you enroll in.
The exam, paper, quiz and problem set marks come from what reviewers wrote, and a mark reaches a row here only where at least two of them said the same thing. A blank means nobody said, which is not the same as none: where a reviewer said there were none, the row says none. A mark carrying ×? is a kind reviewers wrote about without any of them giving a number, which is not the same as none either.
Balanced puts most of the weight on the grade record, then on how full the section is now, then on whether it was open at the last reading. Grades, Seat odds and Open first each lean the whole way onto one of those.
The ranking is meant to be arguable rather than handed down. These four chips are its corners: w_gpa, w_fill and w_open in the address bar take any weights you like, and a link carrying them can be shared.
Seat risk combines how full the section is now with how large the course has historically run. Reserved-seat restrictions are not parsed yet, so risk is a tier rather than a percentage: a section can read “94 spots left” with most of them held for a major.
Always check MyUCLA before you enroll. dibs holds nothing and cannot move you up a list. If MyUCLA disagrees with this page, MyUCLA is right.
Sections limited to a particular year are marked in the list, not hidden, because you have not said what year you are.
Remembered on this device and on your account, because it decides which alerts can reach you. Choose "Rather not say" to clear it.