MGMT 298D
Special Topics in Management
Grades
3.63
Average grade awarded in MGMT 298D. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
66%
of the 6,012 letter grades
D, F or W
0.2%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
-
the registrar has this letter grade only this term
The registrar's own records: 6,012 grades over 16 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
3 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 16 terms ran 3.54 to 3.98.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 574 · 9.5%
- A 1,966 · 32.7%
- A- 1,416 · 23.6%
- B+ 1,231 · 20.5%
- B 650 · 10.8%
- B- 127 · 2.1%
- C+ 23 · 0.4%
- C 12 · 0.2%
- C- 2 · 0.0%
- F 11 · 0.2%
- S 1 of 6,031
- U 1 of 6,031
- I 17 of 6,031
Percentages are of the 6,012 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: satisfactory (S), unsatisfactory (U), and incompletes (I).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Fall 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOLMES, CATHERINE MOGILNER reviews ↗ | 3.80 | 3.80 | 459 | 4 | 86% | - | not teaching it |
| FRONS, BRIAN S reviews ↗ | 3.57 | 3.56 | 424 | 8 | 53% | - | not teaching it |
| LARKIN, IAN ISRAEL reviews ↗ | 3.71 | 3.71 | 345 | 3 | 78% | - | not teaching it |
| ALDERTON, DEREK J reviews ↗ | 3.65 | 3.65 | 270 | 8 | 67% | - | not teaching it |
| GUBER, HOWARD PETER reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.55 | 264 | 3 | 57% | - | not teaching it |
| SOOD, SANJAY reviews ↗ | 3.53 | 3.52 | 260 | 3 | 52% | - | not teaching it |
| KRAMER, TERRY D reviews ↗ | 3.42 | 3.41 | 240 | 3 | 47% | - | not teaching it |
| SLOAN, HARRY E reviews ↗ | 3.51 | 3.50 | 230 | 4 | 52% | - | not teaching it |
| DANIELS, SUSANNE reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.56 | 229 | 5 | 60% | - | not teaching it |
| EISFELDT, ANDREA LYNN reviews ↗ | 3.74 | 3.74 | 224 | 3 | 77% | - | not teaching it |
| KINBERG, MALI HELED reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.56 | 202 | 4 | 58% | - | not teaching it |
| SCHUBERT, GREGOR reviews ↗ | 3.65 | 3.66 | 193 | 4 | 65% | - | not teaching it |
| MOORAD, JEFFREY SHAWN reviews ↗ | 3.55 | 3.54 | 191 | 4 | 52% | - | not teaching it |
| GOLDSTEIN, NOAH J reviews ↗ | 3.53 | 3.52 | 188 | 3 | 52% | - | not teaching it |
| WEAVER, KENTON ALAN reviews ↗ | 3.63 | 3.63 | 172 | 3 | 72% | - | not teaching it |
| MCCANEY, JENNIFER TRYGGVI reviews ↗ | 3.52 | 3.51 | 164 | 5 | 69% | - | not teaching it |
| FARRELL, BRIAN J reviews ↗ | 3.61 | 3.61 | 160 | 4 | 63% | - | not teaching it |
| CARUSO, HEATHER MAIIRHE reviews ↗ | 3.37 | 3.34 | 154 | 3 | 43% | - | not teaching it |
| WACZIARG, ROMAIN T reviews ↗ | 3.69 | 3.70 | 143 | 2 | 70% | - | not teaching it |
| CAMPION, ANDREW reviews ↗ | 3.54 | 3.53 | 130 | 2 | 51% | - | not teaching it |
| NGANGOUE, MARYSE KATHLEEN reviews ↗ | 3.59 | 3.58 | 119 | 4 | 60% | - | not teaching it |
| ZHANG, JINYUAN reviews ↗ | 3.75 | 3.77 | 107 | 4 | 81% | - | not teaching it |
| FREIXES, GONZALO reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.55 | 105 | 2 | 54% | - | not teaching it |
| FRIEDMAN, HENRY L reviews ↗ | 3.63 | 3.63 | 99 | 2 | 60% | - | not teaching it |
| BENJAMIN, DANIEL JACOB reviews ↗ | 3.81 | 3.84 | 97 | 3 | 85% | - | not teaching it |
| TOLOUI, OMID reviews ↗ | 3.45 | 3.41 | 86 | 2 | 44% | - | not teaching it |
| SUSSMAN, ERIC H reviews ↗ | 3.66 | 3.66 | 84 | 3 | 73% | - | not teaching it |
| DROLET ROSSI, AIMEE reviews ↗ | 3.74 | 3.76 | 84 | 3 | 76% | - | not teaching it |
| YASMIN, SEEMA reviews ↗ | 3.92 | 3.98 | 74 | 2 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| LIEBERMAN, MARVIN B reviews ↗ | 3.57 | 3.56 | 73 | 2 | 53% | - | not teaching it |
| JOHNSON, ERIC CHARLES reviews ↗ | 3.54 | 3.51 | 70 | 1 | 51% | - | not teaching it |
| WURSTER, THOMAS S reviews ↗ | 3.53 | 3.50 | 57 | 1 | 49% | - | not teaching it |
| RENE, ROBERT WILLIAM reviews ↗ | 3.57 | 3.55 | 53 | 2 | 51% | - | not teaching it |
| GARMAISE, MARK J reviews ↗ | 3.68 | 3.70 | 50 | 2 | 76% | - | not teaching it |
| LONG, ELISA F reviews ↗ | 3.79 | 3.85 | 50 | 2 | 92% | - | not teaching it |
| HERSHFIELD, HAL ERSNER reviews ↗ | 3.91 | 4.00 | 50 | 2 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| ZIPPERSTEIN, STEVEN E reviews ↗ | 3.89 | 3.98 | 49 | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| OSBORNE, ALFRED E, JR reviews ↗ | 3.64 | 3.64 | 44 | 1 | 68% | - | not teaching it |
| DELMAS, MAGALI A reviews ↗ | 3.72 | 3.75 | 43 | 2 | 79% | - | not teaching it |
| KARMARKAR, UDAY S reviews ↗ | 3.55 | 3.52 | 43 | 1 | 49% | - | not teaching it |
| NORTHROP, GAYLE SCHECK reviews ↗ | 3.75 | 3.80 | 40 | 2 | 75% | - | not teaching it |
| ABE, GEORGE JIRO reviews ↗ | 3.55 | 3.51 | 38 | 1 | 50% | - | not teaching it |
| HADDAD, VALENTIN P reviews ↗ | 3.74 | 3.79 | 38 | 1 | 74% | - | not teaching it |
| NEIL, DOUGLAS GORDON reviews ↗ | 3.67 | 3.69 | 37 | 1 | 70% | - | not teaching it |
| SPARKS, BRAD reviews ↗ | 3.71 | 3.75 | 35 | 2 | 80% | - | not teaching it |
| HAGGAG, KAREEM FAHMY reviews ↗ | 3.69 | 3.72 | 35 | 1 | 77% | - | not teaching it |
| GREENE, STEPHEN ATKINS reviews ↗ | 3.61 | 3.60 | 33 | 2 | 61% | - | not teaching it |
| EMERUWA, I OBI reviews ↗ | 3.72 | 3.76 | 32 | 2 | 78% | - | not teaching it |
| GALLUS, JANA reviews ↗ | 3.87 | 4.00 | 30 | 2 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| UNZUETA, MIGUEL M reviews ↗ | 3.85 | 3.98 | 30 | 1 | 97% | - | not teaching it |
| CHEN, KEITH reviews ↗ | 3.66 | 3.68 | 28 | 1 | 68% | - | not teaching it |
| WELCH, IVO I reviews ↗ | 3.57 | 3.54 | 27 | 1 | 63% | - | not teaching it |
| PRAKASH, ABHIJAY reviews ↗ | 3.58 | 3.55 | 25 | 1 | 56% | - | not teaching it |
| MINOR, DYLAN BLU reviews ↗ | 3.72 | 3.79 | 20 | 1 | 85% | - | not teaching it |
| CARUSO, EUGENE MATTHEW reviews ↗ | 3.60 | 3.56 | 18 · | 1 | 44% | - | not teaching it |
| LIN, DEBBIE WEI-LONG reviews ↗ | 2.96 | 2.26 | 16 · | 1 | 44% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
In Falls
Ran in 5 of the last 5 Falls.
From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.
From the registrar's catalog
Lecture, three hours. Designed for graduate students. In-depth examination of problems or issues of current concern in management, with numerous topics offered each year. May be repeated for credit. Letter grading.
Sections in Fall 2025
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking MGMT 298D was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.