Skip to content
dibs
You are looking at Spring 2027. Enrollment for it has not opened, so these are the registrar's early listings. dibs holds 3,658 sections for Spring 2027, read 42 hours ago. Separately, it has finished 2,718 of the 3,572 courses on its current checking list for this term. Future-term coverage is incomplete, so a course with nothing here may simply not have been reached yet. Back to Fall 2026

MGMT 298D

Special Topics in Management

4 units

Sections & times

Lecture.

Spring 2027: 18 sections. Nothing here is open. The oldest of these readings was about 1 month ago.

Grades

3.63

Average grade awarded in MGMT 298D. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.

In the A range

66%

of the 6,012 letter grades

D, F or W

0.2%

of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals

Taken pass/no pass

-

the registrar has this letter grade only this term

The registrar's own records: 6,012 grades over 16 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.

What is inside that record

3 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.

The table below splits them, and term averages across those 16 terms ran 3.54 to 3.98.

Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.

  • A+ 574 · 9.5%
  • A 1,966 · 32.7%
  • A- 1,416 · 23.6%
  • B+ 1,231 · 20.5%
  • B 650 · 10.8%
  • B- 127 · 2.1%
  • C+ 23 · 0.4%
  • C 12 · 0.2%
  • C- 2 · 0.0%
  • F 11 · 0.2%
  • S 1 of 6,031
  • U 1 of 6,031
  • I 17 of 6,031

Percentages are of the 6,012 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: satisfactory (S), unsatisfactory (U), and incompletes (I).

How the non-letter outcomes are counted

They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.

By instructor

Predicted GPA, raw average, sample size, terms, A range and the workload reviewers reported for every instructor with a grade record in this course
Instructor Predicted GPA Raw n Terms A range Workload Spring 2027
HOLMES, CATHERINE MOGILNER reviews ↗ 3.80 3.80 459 4 86% - not teaching it
FRONS, BRIAN S reviews ↗ 3.57 3.56 424 8 53% - not teaching it
LARKIN, IAN ISRAEL reviews ↗ 3.71 3.71 345 3 78% - not teaching it
ALDERTON, DEREK J reviews ↗ 3.65 3.65 270 8 67% - not teaching it
GUBER, HOWARD PETER reviews ↗ 3.56 3.55 264 3 57% - not teaching it
SOOD, SANJAY reviews ↗ 3.53 3.52 260 3 52% - not teaching it
KRAMER, TERRY D reviews ↗ 3.42 3.41 240 3 47% - not teaching it
SLOAN, HARRY E reviews ↗ 3.51 3.50 230 4 52% - not teaching it
DANIELS, SUSANNE reviews ↗ 3.56 3.56 229 5 60% - not teaching it
EISFELDT, ANDREA LYNN reviews ↗ 3.74 3.74 224 3 77% - not teaching it
KINBERG, MALI HELED reviews ↗ 3.56 3.56 202 4 58% - not teaching it
SCHUBERT, GREGOR reviews ↗ 3.65 3.66 193 4 65% - not teaching it
MOORAD, JEFFREY SHAWN reviews ↗ 3.55 3.54 191 4 52% - not teaching it
GOLDSTEIN, NOAH J reviews ↗ 3.53 3.52 188 3 52% - not teaching it
WEAVER, KENTON ALAN reviews ↗ 3.63 3.63 172 3 72% - not teaching it
MCCANEY, JENNIFER TRYGGVI reviews ↗ 3.52 3.51 164 5 69% - not teaching it
FARRELL, BRIAN J reviews ↗ 3.61 3.61 160 4 63% - not teaching it
CARUSO, HEATHER MAIIRHE reviews ↗ 3.37 3.34 154 3 43% - not teaching it
WACZIARG, ROMAIN T reviews ↗ 3.69 3.70 143 2 70% - not teaching it
CAMPION, ANDREW reviews ↗ 3.54 3.53 130 2 51% - not teaching it
NGANGOUE, MARYSE KATHLEEN reviews ↗ 3.59 3.58 119 4 60% - not teaching it
ZHANG, JINYUAN reviews ↗ 3.75 3.77 107 4 81% - not teaching it
FREIXES, GONZALO reviews ↗ 3.56 3.55 105 2 54% - not teaching it
FRIEDMAN, HENRY L reviews ↗ 3.63 3.63 99 2 60% - not teaching it
BENJAMIN, DANIEL JACOB reviews ↗ 3.81 3.84 97 3 85% - not teaching it
TOLOUI, OMID reviews ↗ 3.45 3.41 86 2 44% - not teaching it
SUSSMAN, ERIC H reviews ↗ 3.66 3.66 84 3 73% - not teaching it
DROLET ROSSI, AIMEE reviews ↗ 3.74 3.76 84 3 76% - not teaching it
YASMIN, SEEMA reviews ↗ 3.92 3.98 74 2 100% - not teaching it
LIEBERMAN, MARVIN B reviews ↗ 3.57 3.56 73 2 53% - not teaching it
JOHNSON, ERIC CHARLES reviews ↗ 3.54 3.51 70 1 51% - not teaching it
WURSTER, THOMAS S reviews ↗ 3.53 3.50 57 1 49% - not teaching it
RENE, ROBERT WILLIAM reviews ↗ 3.57 3.55 53 2 51% - not teaching it
GARMAISE, MARK J reviews ↗ 3.68 3.70 50 2 76% - not teaching it
LONG, ELISA F reviews ↗ 3.79 3.85 50 2 92% - not teaching it
HERSHFIELD, HAL ERSNER reviews ↗ 3.91 4.00 50 2 100% - not teaching it
ZIPPERSTEIN, STEVEN E reviews ↗ 3.89 3.98 49 1 100% - not teaching it
OSBORNE, ALFRED E, JR reviews ↗ 3.64 3.64 44 1 68% - not teaching it
DELMAS, MAGALI A reviews ↗ 3.72 3.75 43 2 79% - not teaching it
KARMARKAR, UDAY S reviews ↗ 3.55 3.52 43 1 49% - not teaching it
NORTHROP, GAYLE SCHECK reviews ↗ 3.75 3.80 40 2 75% - not teaching it
ABE, GEORGE JIRO reviews ↗ 3.55 3.51 38 1 50% - not teaching it
HADDAD, VALENTIN P reviews ↗ 3.74 3.79 38 1 74% - not teaching it
NEIL, DOUGLAS GORDON reviews ↗ 3.67 3.69 37 1 70% - not teaching it
SPARKS, BRAD reviews ↗ 3.71 3.75 35 2 80% - not teaching it
HAGGAG, KAREEM FAHMY reviews ↗ 3.69 3.72 35 1 77% - not teaching it
GREENE, STEPHEN ATKINS reviews ↗ 3.61 3.60 33 2 61% - not teaching it
EMERUWA, I OBI reviews ↗ 3.72 3.76 32 2 78% - not teaching it
GALLUS, JANA reviews ↗ 3.87 4.00 30 2 100% - not teaching it
UNZUETA, MIGUEL M reviews ↗ 3.85 3.98 30 1 97% - not teaching it
CHEN, KEITH reviews ↗ 3.66 3.68 28 1 68% - not teaching it
WELCH, IVO I reviews ↗ 3.57 3.54 27 1 63% - not teaching it
PRAKASH, ABHIJAY reviews ↗ 3.58 3.55 25 1 56% - not teaching it
MINOR, DYLAN BLU reviews ↗ 3.72 3.79 20 1 85% - not teaching it
CARUSO, EUGENE MATTHEW reviews ↗ 3.60 3.56 18 · 1 44% - not teaching it
LIN, DEBBIE WEI-LONG reviews ↗ 2.96 2.26 16 · 1 44% - not teaching it
Why Predicted is not the Raw average

“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.

Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.

Reviews for MGMT 298D

Workload and assignments

Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.

dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.

Read the source reviews

In Springs

Ran in 4 of the last 4 Springs.

From the terms dibs holds, which start in Fall 2021 and exclude summer. A department can run a course in a quarter it never has before.

From the registrar's catalog

Lecture, three hours. Designed for graduate students. In-depth examination of problems or issues of current concern in management, with numerous topics offered each year. May be repeated for credit. Letter grading.

Sections in Spring 2027

Seat counts as of : the oldest of these 18 readings. Seat readings are snapshots, not live availability. Their timestamps show when dibs last checked.

Final enrollment, averaged across each term's sections: between 28 and 56 a term over 13 terms, summer excluded, most recently 49 in Fall 2025. That is the shape across years, not this term, which is above.

Seats over time in Spring 2027

Read once so far, so there is no line to draw yet.

What turns this into a chart

A second reading is what turns this into a chart: courses come round within about three hours, and a lecture somebody is watching goes to the front of the pass. Watching is on the lecture's own page, not this one.

How readings and alerts work

A reading and an hourly record are different things, and most charts here hold more of the second missing than present. dibs has taken readings of a section since long before it began keeping an hour-by-hour log of when it looked, so the empty stretches are dibs saying it was not keeping that log yet, not that it looked and found nothing. That is the age of the record and not a fault.

Seat counts show the last successful read, not live availability. Refreshes can be delayed by request limits or upstream interruptions. Watched sections receive priority, but an hourly update for every section is not guaranteed.

The registrar can change a seat count between our checks. Alerts depend on dibs detecting an opening and completing delivery; a quiet watch does not prove that no seat opened. Check the registrar before enrolling.

From the people who took it

Student reviews

What taking MGMT 298D was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.

Your experience could be the first.

No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.

Looking for more perspectives?

External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.

Read reviews on BruinWalk

Community guidelines