CCAS 191
Variable Topics Research Seminars: Chicana/o and Central American Studies
Grades
3.52
Average grade awarded in CCAS 191. Not a student rating: this is what the grades were.
In the A range
69%
of the 570 letter grades
D, F or W
3.0%
of every letter grade awarded, plus withdrawals
Taken pass/no pass
1%
7 of 8 students passed
The registrar's own records: 570 grades over 13 terms, Fall 2021 to Fall 2025. Every instructor is pooled here.
What is inside that record
3 of those terms are summer sessions, and summer sessions are counted here.
The table below splits them, and term averages across those 13 terms ran 2.64 to 3.98.
Historical grades for all professors, across recorded terms. The course summary above includes all professors.
- A+ 91 · 16.0%
- A 232 · 40.7%
- A- 68 · 11.9%
- B+ 49 · 8.6%
- B 49 · 8.6%
- B- 28 · 4.9%
- C+ 12 · 2.1%
- C 12 · 2.1%
- C- 12 · 2.1%
- D+ 1 · 0.2%
- D 3 · 0.5%
- F 13 · 2.3%
- P 7 of 582
- NP 1 of 582
- I 3 of 582
- NR 1 of 582
Percentages are of the 570 letter grades. Grey bars are non-letter outcomes: passes (P), no-passes (NP), incompletes (I), and no report (NR).
How the non-letter outcomes are counted
They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted GPA | Raw | n | Terms | A range | Workload | Summer Session A 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALDERON, HECTOR V reviews ↗ | 3.25 | 3.21 | 115 | 4 | 49% | heavy | not teaching it |
| BOJ LOPEZ, FLORIDALMA ELIZABETH reviews ↗ | 3.77 | 3.82 | 96 | 2 | 88% | average | not teaching it |
| AVILA, ERIC R reviews ↗ | 3.67 | 3.70 | 85 | 2 | 79% | - | not teaching it |
| VALENZUELA, ABEL, JR reviews ↗ | 3.88 | 3.98 | 61 | 1 | 100% | - | not teaching it |
| GASPAR DE ALBA, ALICIA reviews ↗ | 3.10 | 2.96 | 52 | 2 | 31% | - | not teaching it |
| CHAVEZ MORENO, LAURA CAROLINA reviews ↗ | 3.14 | 3.02 | 50 | 2 | 30% | - | not teaching it |
| ALMA, KARINA reviews ↗ | 3.70 | 3.78 | 40 | 1 | 90% | - | not teaching it |
| BARRETO, MATTHEW ALEJANDRO reviews ↗ | 3.55 | 3.57 | 35 | 2 | 80% | very light | not teaching it |
| ROMERO, ROBERT C reviews ↗ | 3.56 | 3.59 | 20 | 1 | 75% | - | not teaching it |
| GARCIA HERNANDEZ, YESSICA reviews ↗ | 3.61 | 3.71 | 16 · | 1 | 81% | - | not teaching it |
Why Predicted is not the Raw average
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department, so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
Grade records describe outcomes. For what a course is like to take, read student reviews written on dibs below or follow the separate external review link.
Workload and assignments
Work types reported in BruinWalk reviews of this course, across recorded instructors and terms. They may differ from this term's syllabus.
dibs has not read this course’s reviews, so it cannot say what kind of work it sets. That is dibs not having looked. It is not a course without papers or exams, and the reviews linked below are the answer until dibs catches up.
From the registrar's catalog
Seminar, three hours. Limited to juniors/seniors. Research seminar organized around readings and engaged discussion of critical topic of interest in field. Exploration of issue, its theoretical implication for field, and practical implications for communities. Final research project required. May be repeated for credit. P/NP or letter grading.
Sections in Summer Session A 2026
From the people who took it
Student reviews
What taking CCAS 191 was like: the work, the teaching, and what students wish they’d known.
Your experience could be the first.
No student reviews are available to read on dibs for this course yet. Took it? Tell the next person what helped, what was hard, and how you spent your time.
Looking for more perspectives?
External reviews are separate and do not count toward the dibs rating.